Bitcoin and Ethereum Scarcity Driven by Different Structural Forces → Insights

A close-up view reveals a sleek, metallic cylindrical object featuring distinct blue rings and internal structural elements. Portions of the cylinder are partially covered by a textured, light gray, granular substance, giving it a dynamic and processed appearance

A visually striking, abstract object floats against a soft grey-white gradient background, featuring a textured, translucent surface that shifts from clear to deep blue. Two highly polished metallic cylindrical modules are integrated into its core, with a prominent central component and a smaller one positioned below

Briefing

The core insight is that Bitcoin and Ethereum are experiencing two fundamentally different, yet equally powerful, supply shocks. This suggests the market is structurally differentiating the assets → Bitcoin is being treated as a permanent reserve asset by long-term holders, while Ethereum is being treated as a productive utility asset by stakers. This thesis is proven by the fact that 78% of Bitcoin’s circulating supply is now classified as illiquid , meaning it has not moved for over a year.

Context

The common market uncertainty is whether the recent price consolidation is a sign of waning demand or a healthy accumulation phase. Investors are wondering if new capital is strong enough to absorb any potential selling pressure. The core question is → Are these assets still being bought to be held, or are they being sold for short-term profit?

The image precisely depicts two distinct, gear-like mechanical components—one a vibrant blue, the other a dark metallic grey—interconnected by a dynamically flowing, translucent blue fluid. Visible within the fluid are multiple metallic rods, suggesting an intricate internal mechanism

Analysis

The analysis centers on two metrics → Illiquid Supply for Bitcoin and Staked ETH Percentage for Ethereum. Illiquid Supply measures the percentage of coins held in wallets that historically only sell during major bull market peaks. When this percentage rises, it means more coins are being removed from the liquid market by strong-handed holders. The Staked ETH Percentage measures the supply locked in the consensus mechanism, which is a utility-driven lockup.

The data shows a six-month trend where Bitcoin’s illiquid supply has steadily climbed to a new all-time high, confirming maximal holding conviction. Simultaneously, Ethereum’s staked supply has accelerated, confirming that utility is driving a growing, non-speculative supply lock. The dual trend indicates both assets are becoming structurally scarcer, but for distinct reasons.

The visual displays a sophisticated digital mechanism featuring a central white, elongated toroidal component seamlessly linking two distinct modular assemblies. Each assembly presents transparent, crystalline outer layers encasing intricate, glowing blue internal structures that resemble advanced circuitries, actively processing information

Parameters

Bitcoin Illiquid Supply → 78% of circulating supply. This is the percentage of coins held in wallets that rarely sell.
Staked ETH Percentage → 26% of circulating supply. This is the percentage of Ethereum locked in the consensus staking mechanism.
Timeframe → Last 6 months. The period over which the divergence in scarcity models accelerated.

A large, faceted, translucent blue object, resembling a sculpted gem, is prominently displayed, with a smaller, dark blue, round gem embedded on its surface. A second, dark blue, faceted gem is blurred in the background

Outlook

This structural insight suggests a strong foundation for both assets, with future price action likely to be highly sensitive to new capital inflows meeting this shrinking liquid supply. The near-term future points to continued supply scarcity. A confirming signal to watch for is a significant decrease in the Bitcoin Exchange Netflow , which would show the remaining liquid supply is still being withdrawn for cold storage.

The market is cementing Bitcoin as a reserve asset and Ethereum as a productive utility, driving two distinct but powerful supply scarcity narratives.

on-chain supply shock, illiquid supply trend, staked ether growth, structural scarcity, holder conviction, long-term accumulation, utility driven lockup, digital reserve asset, productive asset, exchange reserve drain, supply dynamics, long-term holding, asset differentiation, market structure, coin dormancy, wallet accumulation, network utility, asset maturity, structural demand, scarcity models Signal Acquired from → glassnode.com