Bitcoin Is Savings, Ethereum Is Utility, Proven by Coin Movement → Insights

The image features two sleek, white, modular cylindrical structures, appearing to connect or interact dynamically, with a bright blue energy core and translucent blue liquid splashes emanating from their interface. The mechanical components are partially submerged in or surrounded by the splashing liquid, suggesting active data transfer or energy flow

The image showcases an abstract view of intricate blue and silver mechanical components, including gears and conduits, enveloped by a translucent, bubbly fluid. These elements are arranged in a dynamic, interconnected structure against a soft grey background, highlighting their detailed design and interaction with the fluid

Briefing

The on-chain data confirms a fundamental divergence in asset behavior → Bitcoin is being treated as a savings asset, while Ethereum is increasingly used as a productive asset. The core insight is that long-term Bitcoin holders are keeping their supply dormant, but older Ethereum coins are mobilizing at a rate three times faster than Bitcoin, suggesting ETH is being actively deployed in staking, DeFi, and arbitrage. This behavioral split reinforces Bitcoin’s status as a dominant store-of-value and Ethereum’s hybrid nature as working collateral. The most important data point is that more than 61% of Bitcoin’s supply has not moved in over a year , compared to Ethereum’s long-term supply share decline from ~56% to ~52%.

A central mass of dark blue, geometrically precise crystals is contained within a clear, spherical boundary, encircled by three smooth, white spheres. This composition evokes the architecture of blockchain systems, where the crystalline core represents the immutable ledger and cryptographic primitives

Context

Many investors wonder if Bitcoin and Ethereum are competing for the same market share or if their roles are fundamentally different. Is the recent price volatility affecting the conviction of long-term holders, or are they holding firm? This data answers the question by showing how each asset’s core investor base is actually using the coin on the blockchain, providing clarity on their distinct economic functions and future market positioning.

A macro view reveals a twisting, transparent structure resembling interwoven channels, encapsulating multiple bright blue cylindrical components. The central focus is sharp, highlighting the intricate details of the clear material and the distinct blue elements within, set against a soft, out-of-focus background of similar cool tones

Analysis

The key indicator is Dormancy , which measures how long coins have remained stationary in a wallet. When dormancy increases, it means old coins are staying put, signaling strong conviction. When it decreases, old coins are being spent or moved, signaling profit-taking or utility use. Bitcoin’s supply is aging, with over 61% held for more than a year, and its average dormancy has doubled over five years.

This pattern shows a strong, unwavering savings conviction. Conversely, Ethereum’s long-term supply share is declining, and its older coins are mobilizing three times faster than Bitcoin’s. This movement is not simply selling; it is utility-driven rotation into staking, liquid restaking, and DeFi, confirming Ethereum’s role as a functional, productive asset.

The image displays three abstract, smoothly contoured shapes intertwined against a soft gradient background. A vibrant, opaque dark blue form, a frosted translucent light blue shape, and a glossy white element are interconnected, suggesting a fluid, sculptural arrangement

Parameters

Bitcoin Dormant Supply → Over 61% of supply has not moved in over a year. This represents the portion of BTC held with long-term conviction.
Ethereum LTH Mobilization → Older ETH coins are moving at a rate three times faster than older BTC coins. This quantifies the relative activity of long-term holders.
ETH Long-Term Supply Share → Declined from ~56% to ~52%. This shows a measurable reduction in static long-term holdings.

A close-up view reveals a transparent, multi-chambered mechanism containing distinct white granular material actively moving over a textured blue base. The white substance appears agitated and flowing, guided by the clear structural elements, with a circular metallic component visible within the blue substrate

Outlook

This insight suggests that both assets are structurally sound but serve different purposes, which is a healthy sign for the overall market. Bitcoin will likely continue to absorb capital as a reserve asset, while Ethereum will see continued demand from institutional products and DeFi utility. The confirming signal to watch is the Exchange Balance Trend for both assets; if they continue to fall, moving into custody and institutional wrappers, it will reinforce the supply squeeze and the long-term holding thesis for both.

A central mass of vibrant blue, multifaceted crystals forms the nucleus, surrounded by three luminous white spheres connected by slender, dark metallic strands. A smooth, white toroidal element orbits this core structure

Verdict

The on-chain behavior of long-term holders confirms Bitcoin as a savings asset and Ethereum as a utility asset, establishing two distinct and healthy market narratives.

Bitcoin dormancy, Ethereum mobilization, long term holders, supply dynamics, coin velocity, store of value, productive asset, LTH supply, aging supply, crypto utility, on chain data, asset divergence, network activity, capital base Signal Acquired from → glassnode.com