Fair Consensus Factory Mitigates MEV through Order Neutrality
Research introduces the Fair Consensus Factory, a systemic framework to integrate order-fairness primitives into Byzantine consensus, directly addressing the foundational MEV problem.
Near-Optimal Signature-Free Byzantine Agreement Reduces Blockchain Communication Cost
New signature-free validated Byzantine agreement protocols achieve near-optimal bit complexity, fundamentally reducing the communication overhead for synchronous state machine replication.
Falcon Protocol Achieves Low Latency Asynchronous Byzantine Fault Tolerance
A novel Graded Broadcast mechanism bypasses the agreement stage in aBFT, delivering high throughput and low latency under network uncertainty.
New Lower Bound Solidifies Quadratic Communication Barrier for Byzantine Consensus
This research proves that even randomized Byzantine Agreement protocols require quadratic communication complexity against adaptive adversaries, fundamentally limiting consensus scalability.
Mechanism Design Creates Truthful Equilibrium for Proof of Stake Consensus
A revelation mechanism, triggered by disputes, enforces a unique truthful equilibrium in Proof-of-Stake, enhancing security and scalability.
Set Byzantine Consensus Decentralizes Rollup Sequencing and Data Availability
Set Byzantine Consensus introduces a new primitive for L2s, enabling a decentralized 'arranger' service to eliminate sequencer centralization and censorship risk.
Revelation Mechanisms Enforce Truthful Consensus in Proof-of-Stake Networks
Mechanism design introduces revelation games to Proof-of-Stake, ensuring a unique truthful equilibrium that fundamentally mitigates coordination failures and dishonest forks.
Revelation Mechanisms Enforce Truthful Consensus in Proof-of-Stake Protocols
Game theory-based revelation mechanisms create a unique, truthful equilibrium for PoS consensus, fundamentally securing block proposal against economic attack.
Mechanism Design Guarantees Truthful Consensus in Proof-of-Stake Systems
Revelation mechanisms, triggered by disputes, enforce a unique game-theoretic equilibrium where validators must propose truthful blocks, enhancing scalability.
