A delegate call represents a specialized instruction within Ethereum smart contracts, permitting one contract to execute code from another contract. This mechanism allows the calling contract to run external code while retaining its own storage, message sender, and value context. It provides utility for implementing upgradable contracts and shared library logic, promoting code reuse. However, its powerful nature necessitates meticulous security considerations, as improper implementation can lead to severe vulnerabilities.
Context
News related to delegate calls frequently surfaces in reports on smart contract exploits, security audits, and architectural decisions for decentralized applications. The potential for vulnerabilities, such as reentrancy or storage manipulation, often prompts critical examination of existing protocols. Developers continue to refine best practices for its secure deployment, balancing functional flexibility with paramount security requirements in blockchain development.
A misconfigured delegate call in UXLINK's multi-signature wallet granted an attacker administrative control, enabling unauthorized fund exfiltration and token inflation.
A delegate call vulnerability within UXLINK's multisig wallet granted attackers administrative control, enabling the minting of trillions of tokens and a catastrophic asset devaluation.
A delegate call vulnerability in multi-signature wallets grants unauthorized administrative access, enabling illicit fund transfers and token minting, posing a critical risk to asset integrity.
A delegate call vulnerability within a multi-signature wallet granted administrative control, allowing unauthorized asset transfers and limitless token minting.
A critical delegate call vulnerability in UXLINK's multi-signature wallet granted administrative control, enabling unauthorized fund diversion and token minting.
A delegateCall vulnerability in a multi-signature wallet enabled unauthorized administrative control, leading to significant asset drain and token inflation.
A delegate call vulnerability in UXLINK's multi-signature wallet granted an attacker administrative control, enabling unauthorized transfers and token minting.
A delegate call vulnerability in UXLINK's multi-signature wallet enabled unauthorized minting and asset drain, compounded by the attacker's subsequent phishing loss.
A `delegateCall` vulnerability in a multi-signature wallet allowed administrative control takeover and unauthorized token minting, posing a critical risk of asset inflation and value erosion.
A critical delegateCall vulnerability in UXLINK's multi-signature wallet allowed an attacker to seize administrative control, enabling unauthorized fund transfers and token minting.
We use cookies to personalize content and marketing, and to analyze our traffic. This helps us maintain the quality of our free resources. manage your preferences below.
Detailed Cookie Preferences
This helps support our free resources through personalized marketing efforts and promotions.
Analytics cookies help us understand how visitors interact with our website, improving user experience and website performance.
Personalization cookies enable us to customize the content and features of our site based on your interactions, offering a more tailored experience.
