Economic finality describes the point at which the cost to reverse a confirmed transaction on a blockchain becomes prohibitively expensive, making such an action economically impractical for an attacker. Unlike absolute finality, which is cryptographic, economic finality acknowledges that while technically possible, the financial resources required to undo a transaction outweigh any potential gain. This concept provides a practical assurance of transaction permanence, particularly in Proof-of-Work systems. It depends on the network’s security budget and the value secured by the transaction.
Context
Economic finality is a recurring topic in discussions about blockchain security, especially for Proof-of-Work chains like Bitcoin. News often reports on analyses of a network’s economic security, assessing the cost of a 51% attack and its implications for transaction reversibility. The concept helps users and institutions gauge the practical risk associated with accepting transactions as final, influencing the number of confirmations considered sufficient for high-value transfers.
This protocol merges a dynamically available chain with a partially synchronous finality gadget to achieve single-slot finality, eliminating chain reorgs and MEV risks.
The Winkle protocol introduces decentralized coin holder checkpointing, transforming every transaction into a security vote to establish an immutable chain history.
We use cookies to personalize content and marketing, and to analyze our traffic. This helps us maintain the quality of our free resources. manage your preferences below.
Detailed Cookie Preferences
This helps support our free resources through personalized marketing efforts and promotions.
Analytics cookies help us understand how visitors interact with our website, improving user experience and website performance.
Personalization cookies enable us to customize the content and features of our site based on your interactions, offering a more tailored experience.
