Long-range attack mitigation refers to strategies preventing an attacker from rewriting a blockchain’s history from its origin. These security measures are specifically designed to defend Proof-of-Stake blockchain networks against attacks where an adversary attempts to construct an alternative, longer chain starting from the genesis block using compromised old validator keys. Such mitigation techniques often involve checkpointing, light client synchronization protocols, or requiring validators to retain proof of their past participation. Their purpose is to preserve the immutability of the ledger.
Context
Long-range attack mitigation is a critical security consideration in the design and implementation of Proof-of-Stake protocols. While these attacks are theoretical in many established systems, ongoing research seeks to strengthen defenses and ensure the long-term integrity of PoS chains. The effectiveness of these measures directly impacts the trustworthiness and security of staked digital assets.
PoC introduces a collaborative, resource-efficient cryptographic puzzle to prevent long-range attacks, guaranteeing immutable ledger history for PoS/BFT chains.
Winkle introduces a decentralized checkpointing primitive, leveraging the entire coin supply to cryptographically secure PoS history against long-range attacks.
Introducing Verifiable History Commitments, a new cryptographic primitive that cryptographically binds validator keys to historical state, eliminating the long-range attack vector.
The Winkle protocol introduces decentralized coin holder checkpointing, transforming every transaction into a security vote to establish an immutable chain history.
Winkle introduces a decentralized checkpointing primitive, leveraging coin holder transaction-based votes to cryptoeconomically secure PoS history against long-range attacks.
The new Accountability Gadget formally quantifies the economic cost of PoS reorganizations, transforming finality from a social consensus into a provable, suicidal economic guarantee.
A new simulation-resistant honest majority condition proves the security limits of dynamic PoS, enabling a bootstrapping gadget for robust membership changes.
This research formalizes the Dynamic Availability and Reconfiguration (DAR) model, proving the minimum security assumptions required for scalable, decentralized Proof-of-Stake consensus.
A new protocol secures Proof-of-Stake history by anchoring succinct commitments to Bitcoin's Proof-of-Work, providing non-slashable long-range attack safety.
We use cookies to personalize content and marketing, and to analyze our traffic. This helps us maintain the quality of our free resources. manage your preferences below.
Detailed Cookie Preferences
This helps support our free resources through personalized marketing efforts and promotions.
Analytics cookies help us understand how visitors interact with our website, improving user experience and website performance.
Personalization cookies enable us to customize the content and features of our site based on your interactions, offering a more tailored experience.
