Social engineering is a non-technical method of influencing people to give up confidential information or perform actions that benefit the attacker. It relies on psychological manipulation rather than exploiting software vulnerabilities. Common tactics include impersonation, pretexting, and baiting to gain trust and extract data.
Context
Social engineering tactics are frequently employed in cyberattacks targeting individuals and organizations within the digital asset space, often leading to the compromise of private keys or access to exchanges. News reports regularly document instances where users have been deceived into transferring funds or revealing sensitive credentials. Awareness and education regarding these manipulative techniques are paramount for mitigating such security risks.
A sophisticated malware injection targeting core developers bypassed multi-signature security, enabling unauthorized transfer of protocol ownership and asset exfiltration.
Sophisticated phishing leverages DLL side-loading and clipboard hijacking, enabling silent cryptocurrency diversion and data exfiltration from unsuspecting users.
A sophisticated phishing campaign leveraged social engineering and malicious `increaseApproval` transactions to drain user funds, highlighting critical authorization vulnerabilities.
A social engineering exploit against an employee account exposed user PII, highlighting critical internal access control vulnerabilities and disclosure transparency risks.
A sophisticated social engineering campaign bypassed human and smart contract safeguards, enabling a backdoor insertion that drained substantial exchange assets.
Sophisticated investment platforms leveraging trust and high-yield promises represent a persistent social engineering vector for substantial asset exfiltration.
Exploiting visual similarity in transaction histories, address poisoning manipulates user trust, leading to irreversible asset misdirection and significant financial loss.
A sophisticated phishing scheme drained $48 million from a UXLINK exploiter, demonstrating persistent social engineering vulnerabilities across the digital asset landscape.
A malicious `increaseAllowance` signature allowed a phishing group to drain $48 million from a prior UXLINK exploiter, underscoring persistent social engineering risks.
A sophisticated phishing campaign leveraging malicious permit signatures bypassed seasoned DeFi user defenses, resulting in a multi-million dollar asset drain.
A social engineering breach targeting exchange personnel enabled unauthorized access to sensitive user data, underscoring critical human element vulnerabilities.
A sophisticated social engineering campaign leverages fake job opportunities to distribute advanced malware, directly compromising user credentials and crypto wallets.
A sophisticated phishing campaign leverages "ClickFix" lures and compiled malware executables, posing an immediate risk of system compromise for cryptocurrency and retail sector personnel.
A sophisticated phishing attack, attributed to an Advanced Persistent Threat group, attempted to drain $13.5 million from Venus Protocol, highlighting persistent social engineering risks.
A sophisticated social engineering attack leveraging compromised communication channels drained $1.35 million from a prominent founder's private wallets.
We use cookies to personalize content and marketing, and to analyze our traffic. This helps us maintain the quality of our free resources. manage your preferences below.
Detailed Cookie Preferences
This helps support our free resources through personalized marketing efforts and promotions.
Analytics cookies help us understand how visitors interact with our website, improving user experience and website performance.
Personalization cookies enable us to customize the content and features of our site based on your interactions, offering a more tailored experience.
