A supply cap designates a predetermined maximum quantity of a digital asset that can ever exist. This fixed limit is a design feature intended to create digital scarcity, potentially influencing the asset’s long-term value proposition. It contrasts with assets that have inflationary issuance models.
Context
The concept of a supply cap is a foundational element in the economic design of many cryptocurrencies, notably Bitcoin. News articles frequently analyze how this fixed supply interacts with demand dynamics to influence price appreciation and its role as a potential store of value. Current discussions often compare the economic properties of capped-supply assets with those that have elastic or inflationary issuance mechanisms, examining their respective implications for market behavior and adoption.
A delegate call vulnerability within UXLINK's multisig wallet granted attackers administrative control, enabling the minting of trillions of tokens and a catastrophic asset devaluation.
A delegate call vulnerability within a multi-signature wallet granted administrative control, allowing unauthorized asset transfers and limitless token minting.
A delegateCall vulnerability in a multi-signature wallet enabled unauthorized administrative control, leading to significant asset drain and token inflation.
A delegate call vulnerability in UXLINK's multi-signature wallet enabled unauthorized minting and asset drain, compounded by the attacker's subsequent phishing loss.
Polkadot's governance body has enacted a 2.1 billion DOT token supply cap, strategically re-architecting its tokenomics to drive long-term value and network security.
A `delegateCall` vulnerability in a multi-signature wallet allowed administrative control takeover and unauthorized token minting, posing a critical risk of asset inflation and value erosion.
A `delegateCall` vulnerability in UXLINK's multi-signature wallet enabled unauthorized administrative control, leading to asset exfiltration and arbitrary token minting, underscoring critical smart contract design and access control failures.
Polkadot's governance decision to cap DOT supply at 2.1 billion fundamentally re-architects its tokenomics, signaling a strategic pivot to attract long-term institutional capital.
Polkadot's governance-led supply cap fundamentally redefines its tokenomics, positioning DOT as a scarce, institutionally attractive asset within the multichain ecosystem.
Polkadot's governance-driven supply cap fundamentally redefines its tokenomics, establishing scarcity as a core primitive for long-term ecosystem value accrual.
Polkadot's DAO decision to cap DOT supply fundamentally recalibrates its tokenomics, strategically enhancing long-term value proposition for institutional capital and network participants.
We use cookies to personalize content and marketing, and to analyze our traffic. This helps us maintain the quality of our free resources. manage your preferences below.
Detailed Cookie Preferences
This helps support our free resources through personalized marketing efforts and promotions.
Analytics cookies help us understand how visitors interact with our website, improving user experience and website performance.
Personalization cookies enable us to customize the content and features of our site based on your interactions, offering a more tailored experience.
