Briefing
The Bank Policy Institute, alongside the Association of Global Custodians and the Financial Services Forum, has formally recommended that the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) implement stringent, equivalent safeguards for crypto asset custody. This initiative aims to align digital asset custody with established protections for traditional assets, specifically emphasizing asset segregation, operational separation of custody functions, and robust asset control. The recommendations directly address the critical need for a consistent regulatory framework to mitigate systemic risk and enhance investor confidence following the SEC’s January 2025 rescission of Staff Accounting Bulletin 121.
Context
Prior to these recommendations, the digital asset custody landscape was marked by evolving interpretations and inconsistent application of investor protection principles. The rescission of SAB 121 by the SEC in January 2025 removed a significant barrier for banks to custody crypto assets, yet it simultaneously highlighted the ongoing challenge of establishing a clear, universally applied regulatory standard for all entities providing such services. This created a regulatory arbitrage opportunity, necessitating a proactive industry push for a level playing field where all custodians operate under equivalent, prudential mandates.
Analysis
This industry advocacy directly impacts the operational architecture of compliance frameworks for all entities engaged in digital asset custody. The call for equivalent standards mandates that crypto firms and investment advisers offering custody services must integrate robust asset segregation requirements, rigorous ongoing regulatory oversight, and prudential mandates mirroring those governing traditional qualified custodians. This strategic alignment will necessitate significant updates to existing risk mitigation controls and internal governance structures, ensuring that operational resilience and investor protection are paramount. The explicit recommendation against self-custody by investment advisers further solidifies the need for independent, regulated third-party custodians, thereby altering product structuring and service delivery models within the digital asset ecosystem.
Parameters
- Regulatory Body Targeted ∞ U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
- Advocating Entities ∞ Bank Policy Institute, Association of Global Custodians, Financial Services Forum
- Core Principle ∞ Equivalent Safeguards for Crypto Custody
- Key Requirements ∞ Asset Segregation, Separation of Custody, Proper Asset Control
- Specific Prohibition ∞ No Self-Custody by Investment Advisers
- Contextual Regulatory Action ∞ Rescission of Staff Accounting Bulletin 121 (January 2025)
Outlook
The submission of these recommendations marks a critical juncture in the maturation of digital asset regulation, signaling a concerted industry effort to shape the future of crypto custody. This action is likely to catalyze further dialogue between regulators and market participants, potentially leading to formalized rule-making that establishes clear, enforceable standards. Such a development would set a precedent for harmonized global approaches to digital asset safeguarding, fostering greater institutional adoption and reducing jurisdictional fragmentation. The next phase will involve the SEC’s response and potential integration of these principles into a revised or new custody framework, influencing long-term market structure and investor confidence.
Verdict
This proactive industry push for robust, equivalent crypto custody safeguards is an indispensable step toward establishing regulatory clarity and systemic stability, ultimately fortifying investor protection and legitimizing digital assets within the broader financial architecture.
Signal Acquired from ∞ bpi.com