Banks Urge SEC to Strengthen Crypto Custody Safeguards ∞ Regulation

A flawless, translucent blue sphere is centrally positioned within a sculpted, light blue textured cradle. The orb's polished exterior reflects the surrounding environment, representing the secure containment of cryptocurrency and digital tokens

A futuristic transparent device, resembling an advanced hardware wallet or cryptographic module, displays intricate internal components illuminated with a vibrant blue glow. The top surface features tactile buttons, including one marked with an '8', and a central glowing square, suggesting sophisticated user interaction for secure operations

Briefing

The Bank Policy Institute, alongside the Association of Global Custodians and the Financial Services Forum, has formally recommended that the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) implement stringent, equivalent safeguards for crypto asset custody. This initiative aims to align digital asset custody with established protections for traditional assets, specifically emphasizing asset segregation, operational separation of custody functions, and robust asset control. The recommendations directly address the critical need for a consistent regulatory framework to mitigate systemic risk and enhance investor confidence following the SEC’s January 2025 rescission of Staff Accounting Bulletin 121.

A spherical object, half textured in a deep blue and half in a frosted white, is prominently displayed with multiple transparent metallic blades extending through its center, set against a soft-focus snowy mountain background. This visual metaphor encapsulates advanced distributed ledger technology DLT, highlighting complex protocol architecture crucial for blockchain scalability

Context

Prior to these recommendations, the digital asset custody landscape was marked by evolving interpretations and inconsistent application of investor protection principles. The rescission of SAB 121 by the SEC in January 2025 removed a significant barrier for banks to custody crypto assets, yet it simultaneously highlighted the ongoing challenge of establishing a clear, universally applied regulatory standard for all entities providing such services. This created a regulatory arbitrage opportunity, necessitating a proactive industry push for a level playing field where all custodians operate under equivalent, prudential mandates.

A translucent blue spherical module, intricately detailed with numerous metallic ports, is partially encased within a sleek, silver-colored metallic structure. The sphere's internal granular elements suggest complex data processing

Analysis

This industry advocacy directly impacts the operational architecture of compliance frameworks for all entities engaged in digital asset custody. The call for equivalent standards mandates that crypto firms and investment advisers offering custody services must integrate robust asset segregation requirements, rigorous ongoing regulatory oversight, and prudential mandates mirroring those governing traditional qualified custodians. This strategic alignment will necessitate significant updates to existing risk mitigation controls and internal governance structures, ensuring that operational resilience and investor protection are paramount. The explicit recommendation against self-custody by investment advisers further solidifies the need for independent, regulated third-party custodians, thereby altering product structuring and service delivery models within the digital asset ecosystem.

A partially opened, textured metallic vault structure showcases an interior teeming with dynamic blue and white cloud-like formations, representing the intricate flow of digital asset liquidity. Prominent metallic elements, including a spherical dial and concentric rings, underscore the robust cryptographic security protocols and underlying blockchain infrastructure

Parameters

Regulatory Body Targeted ∞ U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
Advocating Entities ∞ Bank Policy Institute, Association of Global Custodians, Financial Services Forum
Core Principle ∞ Equivalent Safeguards for Crypto Custody
Key Requirements ∞ Asset Segregation, Separation of Custody, Proper Asset Control
Specific Prohibition ∞ No Self-Custody by Investment Advisers
Contextual Regulatory Action ∞ Rescission of Staff Accounting Bulletin 121 (January 2025)

The image displays a close-up of a sleek, transparent electronic device, revealing its intricate internal components. A prominent brushed metallic chip, likely a secure element, is visible through the blue-tinted translucent casing, alongside a circular button and glowing blue circuitry

Outlook

The submission of these recommendations marks a critical juncture in the maturation of digital asset regulation, signaling a concerted industry effort to shape the future of crypto custody. This action is likely to catalyze further dialogue between regulators and market participants, potentially leading to formalized rule-making that establishes clear, enforceable standards. Such a development would set a precedent for harmonized global approaches to digital asset safeguarding, fostering greater institutional adoption and reducing jurisdictional fragmentation. The next phase will involve the SEC’s response and potential integration of these principles into a revised or new custody framework, influencing long-term market structure and investor confidence.

Translucent blue cubes form a dense cluster around white spherical elements, interwoven with thin metallic lines against a dark background. This abstract representation visualizes the intricate architecture of decentralized systems and data flow within the cryptocurrency ecosystem

Verdict

This proactive industry push for robust, equivalent crypto custody safeguards is an indispensable step toward establishing regulatory clarity and systemic stability, ultimately fortifying investor protection and legitimizing digital assets within the broader financial architecture.

Signal Acquired from ∞ bpi.com