Briefing

The European Banking Authority (EBA) published two Opinions strongly opposing the European Commission’s (EC) proposed amendments to the draft Regulatory Technical Standards (RTS) under the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA). This action locks in the EBA’s original, more stringent prudential framework for Asset-Referenced Tokens (ARTs), which are commonly referred to as stablecoins. The primary consequence is the immediate rejection of any path for ART issuers to invest reserve assets into non-highly liquid financial instruments, thereby preventing a systemic weakening of the reserve backing. The EBA’s intervention is critical because it directly prevents the relaxation of regulatory limits that would have introduced significant liquidity risks and opened avenues for regulatory arbitrage across the single market.

A close-up view reveals intricate metallic silver and deep blue mechanical components, interconnected by flexible blue tubing. Polished surfaces reflect light, highlighting the precision and robust construction of the internal mechanisms

Context

Prior to this EBA action, the implementation of MiCA’s stablecoin framework was subject to an internal EU dispute, creating uncertainty for ART issuers regarding reserve asset composition. The EBA had initially proposed strict rules requiring reserves to be highly liquid and low-risk, aligning with traditional financial prudential standards. However, the European Commission subsequently proposed amendments that would have permitted investments into a broader range of non-highly liquid financial instruments and relaxed certain regulatory limits, a move that threatened to undermine the core financial stability mandate of the MiCA regulation itself. This legal ambiguity presented a significant challenge for compliance officers attempting to structure reserve portfolios.

A complex, multi-component mechanical assembly, featuring silver and dark blue elements, is enveloped by a vibrant, translucent blue liquid, showcasing intricate details. The fluid exhibits significant motion, creating ripples and dynamic visual effects around the precisely engineered metallic parts, suggesting continuous operation

Analysis

This EBA decision fundamentally stabilizes the compliance framework for all EU-licensed ART issuers. Regulated entities must now maintain reserve asset portfolios composed exclusively of highly liquid, low-risk instruments, requiring a direct update to their asset management and capital requirement systems. The EBA’s position eliminates the potential for issuers to exploit the EC’s proposed flexibility for yield generation at the expense of liquidity, directly impacting product structuring and risk mitigation controls. For firms seeking a MiCA license, the compliance pathway is now clear → reserve assets must adhere to the most conservative interpretation of the prudential rules, reinforcing investor protection and financial stability across the EU digital asset market.

A vibrant blue, metallic, cylindrical mechanism forms the central focus, partially enveloped by a dynamic cascade of numerous small, translucent, spherical particles. The particles appear to be in motion, some clinging to the blue surface, others flowing around it, creating a sense of intricate interaction and processing

Parameters

  • Regulatory Instrument → MiCA Regulatory Technical Standards (RTS) for Asset-Referenced Tokens (ARTs).
  • Core Requirement Preserved → Reserve assets must be invested in highly liquid financial instruments.
  • Risk Mitigated → Potential for significant liquidity risks and regulatory arbitrage across the EU.
  • EBA Action Date → October 10, 2025 (Opinions published).

A close-up view displays a metallic, rectangular processing unit with a brushed texture, featuring integrated circuits and numerous multicolored wires. Visible are blue, red, and black cables meticulously routed through its robust framework, alongside various embedded components and ventilation grilles

Outlook

The EBA’s firm stance sets a powerful precedent, affirming that the prudential integrity of MiCA’s stablecoin regime is non-negotiable, even against internal political pressure from the Commission. This action signals a unified regulatory front focused on systemic stability, which is likely to be mirrored by other global jurisdictions developing their own stablecoin frameworks. The next phase will involve the final publication of the RTS, which is now expected to closely follow the EBA’s original, strict mandate. This clarity, while limiting investment flexibility, de-risks the EU market and provides a clear, durable legal standard that will ultimately unlock institutional confidence in euro-denominated stablecoins.

The EBA’s successful defense of stringent reserve standards ensures the foundational stability of the MiCA framework, establishing the EU as the global benchmark for prudentially sound stablecoin regulation.

MiCA regulation, stablecoin reserves, prudential standards, asset referenced tokens, regulatory technical standards, European Banking Authority, financial stability, liquidity requirements, compliance framework, regulatory arbitrage, crypto asset issuers, EU jurisdiction, digital asset policy, reserve asset composition, EBA opinions, systemic risk, financial instrument classification, payment systems, crypto asset service providers, capital requirements Signal Acquired from → consumerfinancialserviceslawmonitor.com

Micro Crypto News Feeds