European Banking Authority Rejects Commission Amendments Weakening MiCA Stablecoin Reserve Standards → Regulation

The image features a sophisticated mechanical assembly composed of blue and silver gears, shafts, and rings, intricately intertwined. White granular particles are scattered around and within these components, while a transparent, syringe-like element extends from the left

$A complex, abstract structure of clear, reflective material features intertwined and layered forms, surrounding a vibrant blue, spherical core. Light reflects and refracts across its surfaces, creating a sense of depth and transparency$

Briefing

The European Banking Authority (EBA) formally rejected the European Commission’s (EC) proposed amendments to the draft Regulatory Technical Standards (RTS) governing the reserve assets for Asset-Referenced Tokens (ARTs) under the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA). This action immediately halts a regulatory softening, reinforcing the EBA’s position that ART reserves must adhere to a strict prudential framework to prevent systemic liquidity risk and regulatory arbitrage across the EU. The EBA’s Opinion asserts the EC’s changes are inconsistent with MiCA Articles 36(1)(b) and 38(1), which mandate a strong alignment with existing banking liquidity requirements.

A close-up view reveals a highly detailed mechanical component, featuring transparent blue casing and polished silver elements. The central focus is a cylindrical silver mechanism with fine grooves, capped by a clear blue lens-like structure, while intricate metallic parts and subtle blue lights are visible throughout the assembly

Context

Prior to this Opinion, the legal landscape for stablecoins in the EU was moving toward harmonization under MiCA, but a critical ambiguity persisted regarding the precise composition and liquidity of the required reserve assets. The EC’s subsequent proposal to amend the EBA’s draft RTS introduced a significant compliance challenge by suggesting a potential deviation from the strict, bank-like prudential standards the EBA had originally set. This created uncertainty for prospective ART issuers about the ultimate capital and operational requirements necessary to achieve regulatory compliance.

A striking close-up reveals a futuristic, translucent cubic object, featuring metallic panels and a prominent stylized symbol on its faces. The internal structure shows intricate, glowing blue circuitry, set against a softly blurred, dark blue background

Analysis

The EBA’s decisive rejection means that ART issuers must continue to model their compliance frameworks on the highest standard of reserve liquidity and composition, which mirrors the traditional banking sector’s requirements. This directly alters product structuring by requiring ART issuers to hold a greater proportion of highly liquid, minimal-risk assets. The operational cost of capital will increase for issuers, but the risk profile of the token will be significantly reduced, aligning with MiCA’s core financial stability mandate. The chain of effect ensures the EU stablecoin market is anchored by a conservative, low-risk prudential framework, ensuring the financial stability objectives of MiCA are met.

The artwork displays a central white sphere surrounded by a dynamic interplay of white rings and segmented, deep blue elements, all interwoven with fine, transparent lines. This abstract composition evokes the multifaceted nature of decentralized finance DeFi and the underlying blockchain architecture

Parameters

MiCA Articles Cited → Articles 36(1)(b) and 38(1). (These articles govern the composition and liquidity of the reserve assets.)
EBA Draft RTS Submission Date → June 13, 2024. (The date the EBA submitted its original, stricter draft to the EC.)
EC Amendment Date → August 28, 2025. (The date the EC informed the EBA of its intention to amend the draft RTS.)

The image presents a detailed close-up of a translucent, frosted enclosure, featuring visible water droplets on its surface and intricate blue internal components. A prominent grey circular button and another control element are embedded, suggesting user interaction or diagnostic functions

Outlook

The immediate next phase involves the European Commission’s response to the EBA’s Opinion, which may lead to further negotiation or a formal decision to proceed with or withdraw the proposed amendments. Should the EBA’s stricter standards prevail, this action sets a strong, conservative precedent for global prudential regulation of stablecoins, signaling that European authorities prioritize financial stability and systemic risk mitigation over market flexibility. This regulatory certainty, though strict, is likely to accelerate institutional adoption by establishing a trusted, bank-grade standard for ARTs.

A close-up view highlights a complex mechanical module, predominantly in deep blue and polished silver, with intricate internal components. The textured blue casing contrasts with the highly reflective metallic parts, featuring various circular and interlocking elements

Verdict

The EBA’s defense of stringent reserve liquidity standards under MiCA is a critical win for financial stability, cementing a conservative, bank-like prudential framework for the future of the EU stablecoin market.

Asset Referenced Tokens, Liquidity Requirements, MiCA Regulation, European Banking Authority, Regulatory Technical Standards, Prudential Framework, Systemic Risk, Regulatory Arbitrage, Reserve Assets, Digital Finance, EU Policy, Stablecoin Issuers, Banking Liquidity, Financial Stability Signal Acquired from → europa.eu