European Banking Authority Rejects Commission's MiCA Stablecoin Reserve Liquidity Amendments → Regulation

The image displays a detailed view of a vibrant blue, textured translucent material connected by a frothy white, web-like network to a metallic, out-of-focus component. The blue material features internal variations and a central aperture from which the white network appears to emerge

A striking abstract form, rendered in luminous blue and translucent material, features an outer surface adorned with numerous small, spherical bubbles, set against a soft, gradient background. Its internal structure reveals complex, layered pathways, suggesting intricate design and functional depth within its fluid contours

Briefing

The European Banking Authority (EBA) issued two Opinions rejecting the European Commission’s (EC) proposed amendments to the draft Regulatory Technical Standards (RTS) on the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) reserve requirements. This action immediately solidifies a stricter prudential framework for stablecoin issuers by preventing the introduction of material liquidity risk and regulatory arbitrage. The EBA specifically deemed the EC’s changes inconsistent with Articles 36(1)(b) and 38(1) of MiCA, thereby maintaining a tighter alignment with the established banking liquidity standards.

A reflective, metallic tunnel frames a desolate, grey landscape under a clear sky. In the center, a large, textured boulder with a central circular aperture is visible, with a smaller, textured sphere floating in the upper right

Context

Prior to this intervention, the operationalization of MiCA’s stablecoin framework was subject to a period of technical uncertainty as the EC sought to amend the EBA’s initial draft RTS. The prevailing challenge was the potential for the EC’s proposed changes to permit the investment of issuance proceeds into non-Highly Liquid Financial Instruments (non-HLFI) and to relax crucial concentration and look-through limits. This regulatory ambiguity created a compliance risk for Asset-Referenced Token (ART) and E-Money Token (EMT) issuers, who faced the possibility of a less robust, more market-exposed reserve architecture.

A translucent blue abstract structure dominates the foreground, featuring a central metallic, spiraling element. Small bubbles are visible within the transparent material, particularly on its upper surface, with blurred blue forms in the background

Analysis

This EBA decision mandates that stablecoin issuers, specifically ART and EMT providers, must maintain a conservative reserve architecture fully aligned with the EBA’s original, more stringent standards. The impact directly alters the capital and treasury management systems of regulated entities, preventing the use of instruments that could introduce credit or concentration risk into the reserve. For a firm, this means the compliance framework must strictly prohibit the investment of reserve assets into non-HLFI, ensuring the 1:1 backing remains highly liquid and minimally exposed to market volatility. This is a critical update because it closes a potential loophole for regulatory arbitrage, forcing systemic compliance with banking-grade prudential requirements.

The image displays two intersecting bundles of translucent tubes, some glowing blue and others clear, partially encased in a textured white, frosty material. These bundles form an 'X' shape against a dark background, highlighting their structured arrangement and contrasting textures

Parameters

MiCA Articles Reinforced → Articles 36(1)(b) and 38(1). (These are the specific legal provisions the EBA cited as being violated by the EC’s proposed amendments, relating to the reserve of assets.)
Core Risk Mitigated → Material Liquidity Risk. (The primary risk the EBA sought to prevent by rejecting the EC’s amendments.)
Reserve Requirement Ratio → 1:1. (The fundamental backing ratio for stablecoins under MiCA.)
EC Letter Date → August 28, 2025. (The date the EC informed the EBA of its intention to endorse the RTS with amendments.)

The image displays a central cluster of small, blue, granular forms, surrounded by radiating structures. These structures include reflective blue and silver bars, along with white, textured, frosty elements and spherical masses

Outlook

The EBA’s firm stance ensures the MiCA stablecoin framework will proceed with a high degree of prudential rigor, setting a precedent for banking-style reserve management in digital assets. The next phase involves the EC’s formal response to the EBA’s Opinions, though the EBA has clearly signaled its commitment to close scrutiny of the MiCA prudential framework. This action will likely influence global regulators, including the Financial Stability Board (FSB), who are seeking to establish comprehensive and consistent rules for stablecoins, positioning the EU framework as the gold standard for reserve quality.

A prominent blue Bitcoin emblem with a white 'B' symbol is centrally displayed, surrounded by an intricate network of metallic and blue mechanical components. Blurred elements of this complex machinery fill the foreground and background, creating depth and focusing on the central cryptocurrency icon

Verdict

The EBA’s decisive rejection of relaxed standards affirms the EU’s commitment to a banking-grade prudential framework for stablecoins, structurally reinforcing MiCA’s role as a global benchmark for digital asset financial stability.

MiCA regulation, stablecoin reserves, liquidity requirements, prudential standards, asset-referenced tokens, e-money tokens, regulatory technical standards, European Banking Authority, financial stability, market risk, credit risk, concentration risk, regulatory arbitrage, banking framework, digital asset law, EU financial regulation, reserve composition, compliance framework, systemic risk, prudential supervision Signal Acquired from → europa.eu