SEC Staff Permits Registered Advisers to Use State Trust Crypto Custodians → Regulation

A visually striking tunnel-like structure, composed of intricate blue and white crystalline formations, frames a perfectly centered full moon against a soft grey sky. The varying shades of blue and the textured surfaces create a sense of depth and organic complexity within this icy pathway

The image showcases a high-precision hardware component, featuring a prominent brushed metal cylinder partially enveloped by a translucent blue casing. Below this, a dark, wavy-edged interface is meticulously framed by polished metallic accents, set against a muted grey background

Briefing

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission staff has issued a pivotal No-Action Letter, providing a conditional legal basis for Registered Investment Advisers and Registered Funds to utilize state-chartered trust companies as qualified custodians for digital assets. This action immediately resolves a significant compliance ambiguity under the Advisers Act and Investment Company Act custody rules, allowing regulated entities to access institutional-grade crypto custody services without violating federal securities law. The relief is explicitly conditioned on the trust company adhering to rigorous standards, including the contractual requirement for asset segregation from the custodian’s proprietary holdings.

The image showcases a sophisticated, futuristic mechanical assembly with a prominent white central housing unit and gleaming metallic shafts. Transparent blue conduits, embedded with smaller metallic elements, flank the core mechanism, suggesting complex internal data flow and processing

Context

Prior to this staff action, traditional financial entities, particularly RIAs and registered funds, faced a systemic compliance challenge in meeting the “qualified custodian” requirement of the SEC’s custody rules for digital assets. The statutory definition of a “bank” under the relevant acts did not explicitly encompass state-chartered trust companies that primarily handle digital assets, leaving a legal gap that precluded many firms from safely entering the market. This uncertainty forced many regulated firms to either avoid digital assets or rely on complex, untested legal interpretations, creating systemic risk and stifling institutional adoption.

A high-resolution close-up showcases a clear, transparent component featuring intricate internal blue structures, seamlessly integrated with a broader system of dark blue and metallic elements. The component is angled, highlighting its detailed design and the reflective qualities of its materials

Analysis

This guidance fundamentally alters the operational requirements for asset managers by validating a specific type of custodian within their existing compliance frameworks. Regulated entities must now update their due diligence protocols to verify that the chosen state trust company meets the No-Action Letter’s criteria, focusing specifically on internal controls and the written custodial agreement’s asset segregation clauses. The relief allows for the treatment of state trust companies as “banks” under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, subject to meeting specified safeguards. This de-risking of the custody function is the critical update that enables a scalable, auditable, and legally compliant integration of digital assets into traditional finance portfolios.

A prominent blue faceted object, resembling a polished crystal, is situated within a foamy, dark blue liquid on a dark display screen. The screen beneath illuminates with bright blue data visualizations, depicting graphs and grid lines, all resting on a sleek, multi-tiered metallic base

Parameters

Regulatory Instrument → No-Action Letter (NAL) from SEC Division of Investment Management staff.
Governing Statutes → Investment Advisers Act of 1940 and Investment Company Act of 1940.
Core Mandate → Custodian must contractually mandate asset segregation and prohibit rehypothecation.

A sophisticated, multi-component device showcases transparent blue panels revealing complex internal mechanisms and a prominent silver control button. The modular design features stacked elements, suggesting specialized functionality and robust construction

Outlook

This staff position sets a strong, positive precedent for future SEC rulemaking, which is currently under consideration to formalize crypto custody requirements. The reliance on state-level banking supervision for a federal custody solution suggests a potential template for inter-agency cooperation, which could be replicated for other compliance areas, such as broker-dealer registration. This clarity is expected to unlock substantial capital, as institutional investors now have a defined, low-risk legal mechanism to satisfy their fiduciary duties regarding digital asset safekeeping.

A transparent, effervescent blue substance, covered in intricate bubbles, rests securely within a sophisticated silver and dark blue mechanical structure. The metallic components are precisely engineered, framing the dynamic, liquid-like core

Verdict

The SEC staff’s custody guidance provides the most significant operational clarity this year, formally integrating a key segment of the digital asset infrastructure into the established US regulatory perimeter.

Asset custody, qualified custodian, investment adviser, registered fund, state trust company, no-action relief, asset segregation, fiduciary duty, regulatory clarity, compliance framework, digital asset law, securities law, risk management, operational resilience, custody rule, capital markets, private funds, financial services, legal precedent, market structure Signal Acquired from → mondaq.com