Skip to main content

Multiple Proposer Transaction Fee Mechanism Design ∞ Robust Incentives against Censorship and Bribery

Abstract:

Censorship resistance is one of the core value proposition of blockchains. A recurring design pattern aimed at providing censorship resistance is enabling multiple proposers to contribute inputs into block construction. Notably, Fork-Choice Enforced Inclusion Lists (FOCIL) is proposed to be included in Ethereum. However, the current proposal relies on altruistic behavior, without a Transaction Fee Mechanism (TFM). This study aims to address this gap by exploring how multiple proposers should be rewarded to incentivize censorship resistance. The main contribution of this work is the identification of TFMs that ensure censorship resistance under bribery attacks, while also satisfying the incentive compatibility properties of EIP-1559. We provide a concrete payment mechanism for FOCIL, along with generalizable contributions to the literature by analyzing 1) incentive compatibility of TFMs in the presence of a bribing adversary, 2) TFMs in protocols with multiple phases of transaction inclusion, and 3) TFMs of protocols in which parties are uncertain about the behavior and the possible bribe of others.

Briefing

This paper addresses the critical problem of censorship vulnerability in blockchain networks, which arises from the current single-proposer model, and highlights the inadequacy of existing multi-proposer designs like Fork-Choice Enforced Inclusion Lists (FOCIL) due to their reliance on altruistic behavior. The foundational breakthrough lies in identifying and designing robust Transaction Fee Mechanisms (TFMs) that not only ensure censorship resistance against sophisticated bribery attacks but also uphold the incentive compatibility principles established by EIP-1559. This new theory proposes a concrete payment mechanism for FOCIL, thereby transforming the future of blockchain architecture by enabling economically sound, censorship-resistant block production.

A detailed view presents a series of interconnected, rotating mechanical components, featuring a prominent central white metallic gear-like structure and multiple translucent blue discs with intricate, circuit-like internal designs. These elements are set against a deep grey background, suggesting a complex technological system in operation

Context

Before this research, a prevailing theoretical limitation in blockchain design was the susceptibility to censorship, largely due to the single-proposer model where one entity holds unilateral control over transaction inclusion and ordering within a block. While proposals like Fork-Choice Enforced Inclusion Lists (FOCIL) aimed to decentralize block production by enabling multiple proposers, these designs critically overlooked the economic incentives, assuming altruistic behavior. This theoretical gap left blockchains vulnerable to bribery attacks, where malicious actors could still influence transaction ordering or exclusion by compensating proposers, thereby undermining the core value proposition of censorship resistance.

A vibrant, translucent blue stream, appearing as a liquid data flow, courses across a sleek, dark gray technological interface. Within this glowing stream, a metallic, geometric block featuring a distinct 'Y' symbol is prominently embedded

Analysis

The paper’s core mechanism introduces specifically designed Transaction Fee Mechanisms (TFMs) to overcome the limitations of altruism in multi-proposer systems. The new primitive is a TFM framework that robustly incentivizes multiple block proposers to resist censorship and bribery. It fundamentally differs from previous approaches by integrating economic incentives directly into the multi-proposer architecture.

This involves analyzing how proposers should be rewarded to ensure that including transactions, even those targeted for censorship by a bribing adversary, remains economically rational. The logic extends EIP-1559’s incentive compatibility, adapting it to a multi-proposer environment where parties might be uncertain about the behavior and potential bribes of others, ensuring that the system remains secure and fair under adversarial conditions.

The image showcases a sophisticated, interconnected system of translucent tubes and metallic components, illuminated by glowing blue light. This intricate structure features clear conduits appearing to carry fluid or light, alongside detailed silver and dark grey hardware elements, some adorned with water droplets

Parameters

  • Core Concept ∞ Transaction Fee Mechanism Design
  • New System/Protocol Focus ∞ Fork-Choice Enforced Inclusion Lists (FOCIL)
  • Key Authors ∞ Yulin Ma, Zichen Fan, Qiang Wang
  • Key Problem Addressed ∞ Censorship Resistance
  • Incentive StandardEIP-1559 Compatibility

A close-up view displays a transparent blue mechanical assembly, showcasing intricate internal components. Metallic cylindrical parts are visible, interconnected by black rings and translucent blue structures

Outlook

This research opens new avenues for developing more resilient and decentralized blockchain architectures. The immediate next steps involve the formal integration and testing of these robust Transaction Fee Mechanisms within existing multi-proposer frameworks, particularly FOCIL. In the next 3-5 years, this theory could unlock real-world applications such as truly censorship-resistant transaction processing, fairer transaction ordering in decentralized exchanges, and enhanced security for critical on-chain operations. It also paves the way for further academic inquiry into incentive-compatible mechanism design under dynamic adversarial conditions and multi-agent uncertainty in distributed systems.

This research provides a decisive economic framework for achieving robust censorship resistance, fundamentally strengthening the foundational security and decentralization principles of blockchain technology.

Signal Acquired from ∞ arxiv.org

Micro Crypto News Feeds

transaction fee mechanism

Definition ∞ A Transaction Fee Mechanism dictates how fees are calculated and allocated for processing transactions on a blockchain.

transaction fee mechanisms

Definition ∞ Transaction fee mechanisms dictate how users are charged for initiating and processing transactions on a blockchain network.

censorship resistance

Definition ∞ Censorship resistance is a core characteristic of decentralized systems that prevents any single entity from blocking or altering transactions or data.

economic incentives

Definition ∞ Economic incentives are mechanisms designed to encourage specific behaviors within a system through rewards or penalties.

incentive compatibility

Definition ∞ Incentive Compatibility describes a system design where participants are motivated to act truthfully and in accordance with the system's rules, even if they could potentially gain by misbehaving.

mechanism design

Definition ∞ Mechanism Design is a field of study concerned with creating rules and incentives for systems to achieve desired outcomes, often in situations involving multiple participants with potentially conflicting interests.

resistance

Definition ∞ Resistance, in financial market analysis, denotes a price level at which an asset has historically found it difficult to move higher, indicating strong selling pressure.

eip-1559

Definition ∞ EIP-1559, or Ethereum Improvement Proposal 1559, is a significant upgrade to the Ethereum network's transaction fee mechanism.

transaction ordering

Definition ∞ Transaction Ordering refers to the process by which transactions are arranged into a specific sequence before being included in a block on a blockchain.