Smallest Collusions Define Transaction Fee Mechanism Vulnerability → Research

The image presents two white, bone-like structures, enveloped in a white, foamy, bubbly substance, converging at a central, complex blue and silver mechanical apparatus. This intricate mechanism features glowing blue digital indicators and metallic rings, connecting the two structures within a soft, diffused blue background

A central transparent sphere encloses a molecular-like arrangement of white orbs, with one primary orb at the core and three smaller orbs orbiting it. This core structure is embedded within a larger, blurred matrix of interlocking blue and silver mechanical components, suggesting a complex, digital architecture

Briefing

Traditional transaction fee mechanisms in blockchains struggle with miner and user collusion, a challenge not fully addressed by standard auction theory. This paper introduces c-Side-Contract-Proof (c-SCP) mechanisms, demonstrating that if a mechanism is robust against a two-party collusion involving the miner and two users, it is inherently robust against any larger collusion. This simplifies the analysis of collusion resistance, focusing security efforts on smaller, more manageable collusive groups, thereby enhancing the design of economically secure blockchain protocols.

A close-up view reveals a stack of translucent, modular blocks, with the foreground block prominently featuring a glowing blue interior encased within a frosted, clear outer shell. Distinct parallel grooves are etched into the top surface of this central component, resting on a larger, similarly translucent base structure

Context

Blockchain transaction fee mechanisms, central to network operation, have historically faced challenges from miner and user collusion, a phenomenon often categorized under Maximal Extractable Value (MEV). Existing auction theory, while foundational, did not fully account for the unique dynamics of decentralized, permissionless environments where off-chain side contracts could undermine protocol integrity. The complexity of analyzing collusion across varying numbers of participants presented a significant theoretical hurdle for designing truly robust mechanisms.

A central white sphere is encased by a vibrant, sapphire-blue crystalline formation with sharp, angular facets. A stark white, smooth band cuts diagonally across the foreground, intersecting the sphere and the surrounding crystal matrix

Analysis

The paper’s core contribution is the formalization and analysis of c-Side-Contract-Proof (c-SCP) mechanisms within the blockchain transaction fee context. A mechanism is c-SCP if it remains robust even when the miner colludes with up to ‘c’ users through a side contract. The breakthrough demonstrates that the class of 2-SCP mechanisms is equivalent to the class of c-SCP mechanisms for any c ≥ 2, assuming consistent tie-breaking.

This fundamentally differs from prior approaches by establishing that the critical threshold for collusion vulnerability is surprisingly low → a collusion involving the miner and just two users. If a mechanism can withstand this “small collusion,” it can withstand any larger one, simplifying the design and verification of collusion-resistant protocols.

The image features two transparent, elongated modules intersecting centrally in an 'X' shape, showcasing internal blue-lit circuitry, encased within a clear, intricate lattice framework. A spherical, multifaceted core node is visible in the background

Parameters

Core Concept → c-Side-Contract-Proof Mechanisms
Key Authors → Yotam Gafni
Key Finding → 2-SCP mechanisms equal c-SCP for c≥2
Publication Date → October 6, 2025
Source → arXiv:2510.05986

A sophisticated mechanical assembly features a prominent blue, cube-like central unit with metallic silver detailing and visible screw fasteners. Various blue and grey tubes or conduits emanate from and connect to this central component, suggesting a complex network of pathways

Outlook

This research provides a crucial theoretical lens for future development in blockchain mechanism design. By establishing that the vulnerability to collusion is effectively capped at a “small collusion” (miner + two users), it directs future research and development efforts towards rigorously securing protocols against these specific, minimal collusive groups. In 3-5 years, this foundational understanding could lead to the deployment of more resilient transaction fee mechanisms, significantly reducing the impact of MEV and fostering fairer, more predictable on-chain economic interactions. It also opens new avenues for exploring the practical implications of this equivalence in various blockchain architectures.

This paper fundamentally redefines the theoretical understanding of collusion resistance in blockchain transaction fee mechanisms, offering a critical simplification for future protocol design and security analysis.

Signal Acquired from → arXiv.org