Skip to main content

Briefing

The cross-chain DeFi protocol Garden Finance was subjected to a sophisticated multi-chain exploit, resulting in the unauthorized draining of liquidity pools across Arbitrum, Ethereum, and Solana. This incident immediately exposed the critical security risk inherent in centralized third-party dependencies, specifically a compromised Web2 solver infrastructure that bridged the protocol’s on-chain security perimeter. The total financial loss from the breach is estimated at $10.8 million, with the attacker subsequently laundering a majority of the stolen assets through a privacy mixer.

A close-up view reveals a complex arrangement of blue electronic pathways and components on a textured, light gray surface. A prominent circular metallic mechanism with an intricate inner structure is centrally positioned, partially obscured by fine granular particles

Context

Prior to the exploit, the protocol’s security posture was already under scrutiny due to its alleged high volume of illicit fund flows, which highlighted a systemic failure in compliance and risk monitoring. The reliance on a single, centralized third-party ‘solver’ for complex cross-chain operations created an unacknowledged single point of failure that bypassed the protocol’s core smart contract security. This architectural design elevated the attack surface from a purely on-chain smart contract risk to a more vulnerable Web2 infrastructure risk.

A luminous blue cube is integrated with a detailed, multi-faceted white and blue technological construct, exposing a central circular component surrounded by fine blue wiring. This abstract representation embodies the convergence of cryptographic principles and blockchain architecture, highlighting the sophisticated mechanisms behind digital asset transfer and network consensus

Analysis

The attack vector leveraged a compromise of the third-party solver’s API or private key, which manages off-chain transaction signing for multi-chain operations. By gaining unauthorized access to this centralized component, the threat actor could effectively impersonate the legitimate solver, authorizing and executing withdrawal transactions across multiple interconnected chains. This bypasses the on-chain smart contract logic checks by exploiting a trusted, off-chain administrative function, allowing the attacker to systematically drain WBTC, USDC, and USDT from the protocol’s liquidity pools. The multi-chain scope of the breach confirms the compromise affected a core cross-chain component.

A granular white substance connects to a granular blue substance via multiple parallel metallic conduits, terminating in embedded rectangular components. This visual metaphorically represents a cross-chain bridge facilitating blockchain interoperability between distinct decentralized network segments

Parameters

  • Total Loss Estimate ∞ $10.8 million. (Initial loss estimate before final forensic analysis.)
  • Stolen Assets Laundered ∞ $6.65 million. (Amount transferred to Tornado Cash privacy mixer.)
  • Attack Vector ∞ Third-Party Solver Compromise. (Vulnerability in centralized Web2 infrastructure.)
  • Chains Affected ∞ Arbitrum, Ethereum, Solana. (Multi-chain scope of the exploit.)

The image displays an intricate arrangement of electronic components, characterized by metallic silver and dark grey modules intertwined with translucent blue and clear tubular structures. This complex hardware configuration evokes the sophisticated infrastructure underpinning modern cryptocurrency networks

Outlook

The immediate mitigation step for similar protocols is the rapid decentralization and redundancy of all off-chain administrative and solver functions to eliminate single points of failure. The incident carries a high contagion risk for other multi-chain protocols that rely on similar centralized bridge or solver infrastructure, demanding an immediate security review of all Web2/Web3 interfaces. This event will likely establish a new security best practice requiring external audits to rigorously vet the security of all third-party dependencies, especially those with privileged access to on-chain asset movements.

A close-up view highlights a futuristic in-ear monitor, featuring a translucent deep blue inner casing with intricate internal components and clear outer shell. Polished silver metallic connectors are visible, contrasting against the blue and transparent materials, set against a soft grey background

Verdict

The exploit of the centralized solver infrastructure confirms that the greatest systemic risk to multi-chain DeFi is the operational security failure of its off-chain, trusted components.

Cross-chain exploit, third-party risk, solver compromise, unauthorized withdrawal, liquidity pool drain, multi-chain security, centralized dependency, API key breach, illicit fund flow, asset laundering, white-hat bounty, forensic analysis, Arbitrum, Ethereum, Solana Signal Acquired from ∞ ambcrypto.com

Micro Crypto News Feeds

solver infrastructure

Definition ∞ Solver infrastructure refers to the underlying computational systems and algorithms designed to efficiently resolve complex optimization problems, particularly within decentralized finance.

web2 infrastructure

Definition ∞ Web2 infrastructure refers to the centralized technological foundations that support the current generation of internet applications and services.

liquidity pools

Definition ∞ Liquidity pools are pools of digital assets locked in smart contracts, used to facilitate decentralized trading.

forensic analysis

Definition ∞ Forensic Analysis in the digital asset space involves the systematic investigation of blockchain transactions, smart contract interactions, and related off-chain data to uncover evidence of illicit activities or system anomalies.

privacy mixer

Definition ∞ A privacy mixer is a service designed to obscure the transaction history of cryptocurrencies.

solver compromise

Definition ∞ Solver compromise refers to a security breach or malicious manipulation of a "solver" entity within a decentralized protocol, particularly in systems that rely on solvers for efficient transaction ordering or execution.

multi-chain

Definition ∞ A multi-chain system refers to an architecture that supports multiple independent blockchain networks.

infrastructure

Definition ∞ Infrastructure refers to the fundamental technological architecture and systems that support the operation and growth of blockchain networks and digital asset services.

operational security

Definition ∞ Operational security, often abbreviated as OpSec, is a process that involves protecting sensitive information from adversaries.