Briefing

A decentralized AI data layer protocol suffered a catastrophic supply-side attack after a critical vulnerability was exploited in its cross-chain bridge solution, BridgeIn. The incident’s primary consequence was a systemic failure of the token’s economic model, as the attacker was able to artificially inflate the supply and execute a massive market dump. This unauthorized minting and subsequent liquidation of tokens caused the asset’s price to plummet by a devastating 82%, translating to an estimated market value loss of $14.45 million.

A sleek, white, modular device emits a brilliant blue, energetic stream into a textured, luminous blue substance, creating frothy white patterns. The central apparatus, a sophisticated piece of blockchain infrastructure, appears to be actively engaging in a high-intensity digital asset processing operation

Context

The prevailing risk in multi-chain architectures is the complexity of cross-chain communication and asset wrapping, which often introduces new, unaudited attack surfaces. Specifically, token bridges represent a single point of failure where a logic error can compromise the integrity of the token’s total supply. The security posture was inherently fragile due to a reliance on a custom cross-chain solution that failed to properly validate the minting of new tokens across chains.

A prominent white, smooth, toroidal structure centrally frames a vibrant dark blue, translucent, amorphous mass. From the right side, this blue substance dynamically fragments into numerous smaller, crystalline particles, scattering outwards against a soft grey-blue background

Analysis

The attack vector was a critical flaw within the BridgeIn protocol, the cross-chain solution responsible for token transfers. This vulnerability enabled the attacker to bypass the intended security checks and execute a function that minted an unauthorized one billion new tokens. The attacker then immediately liquidated a portion of this newly created supply → approximately 162.75 million tokens → across decentralized exchanges for BNB, effectively draining liquidity pools and initiating a rapid, forced market revaluation of the asset. The success of the exploit was rooted in the protocol’s failure to enforce a strict, immutable cap on token supply during the cross-chain minting process.

A highly detailed close-up reveals an advanced mechanical assembly, showcasing a combination of polished silver, dark grey, and vibrant blue elements. A central circular component, resembling a lens, is prominently featured, surrounded by a unique white, porous mesh material that connects to other structural parts

Parameters

  • Price Crash Magnitude → 82% (The percentage drop in the token’s market price following the liquidation event).
  • Unauthorized Tokens Minted → 1 Billion (The total number of new tokens created by the attacker exploiting the bridge flaw).
  • Market Value Loss → $14.45 Million (The estimated market capitalization wiped out due to the token dump).
  • Vulnerable Component → BridgeIn Protocol (The specific cross-chain solution with the minting logic flaw).

A large, irregularly shaped white object with a rough texture stands partially submerged in rippling blue water. Next to it, a substantial dark blue circular object with horizontal ridges is also partially submerged, reflecting in the water

Outlook

The immediate mitigation step for the protocol involves a mandatory 1:1 token migration to a new contract with hardened security measures to isolate the compromised supply. This incident establishes a new security best practice → cross-chain solutions must employ formal verification on all supply-altering functions, treating bridge logic as the highest-risk surface. The contagion risk is moderate, but all projects utilizing custom or unaudited token-minting bridge mechanisms must immediately halt operations and undergo a full security review of their supply-side controls.

The exploitation of a bridge’s minting capability confirms that supply-side logic remains the single most critical and under-secured vulnerability in the multi-chain ecosystem.

Cross-chain bridge security, Token minting vulnerability, Supply inflation exploit, Protocol logic flaw, Decentralized finance risk, Token price collapse, Asset drain attack, Smart contract vulnerability, Bridge protocol failure, Token supply manipulation, Cross-chain solution risk, Asset dilution event, Liquidity pool drain Signal Acquired from → ainvest.com

Micro Crypto News Feeds