Skip to main content

Briefing

DeltaPrime, an undercollateralized lending protocol, was exploited for $4.85 million on November 11, 2024, across the Avalanche and Arbitrum blockchains. The incident stemmed from critical input validation vulnerabilities within its debt swap and reward claim functions, allowing an attacker to bypass repayment logic and fraudulently withdraw unearned assets. This exploit highlights the severe consequences of inadequate parameter validation in complex DeFi smart contracts.

A translucent blue device with a smooth, rounded form factor is depicted against a light grey background. Two clear, rounded protrusions, possibly interactive buttons, and a dark rectangular insert are visible on its surface

Context

Prior to this incident, improper function parameter validation was already identified as a significant attack vector within the DeFi ecosystem, contributing to $69 million in losses across 21 incidents in 2024. This class of vulnerability arises when smart contracts fail to adequately scrutinize external inputs, creating pathways for malicious actors to manipulate protocol behavior or bypass intended safeguards. The prevailing risk factors included a reliance on implicit trust in external calls and insufficient developer rigor in edge-case testing.

A close-up shot displays a textured, deep blue, porous object encrusted with a thick layer of sparkling white crystalline structures, resembling frost or snowflakes. A central, slightly blurred opening reveals more of the intricate blue interior

Analysis

The attack leveraged improper input validation within DeltaPrime’s swapDebtParaSwap and claimReward functions. The attacker initiated a flash loan to fund the exploit, then utilized the swapDebtParaSwap function where the _repayAmount parameter lacked validation, allowing them to borrow WBTC against WETH collateral without triggering the necessary repayment logic. Concurrently, a malicious contract was passed to the pair parameter in the claimReward function, enabling the attacker to manipulate the reward system and withdraw unearned ETH. The stolen funds were subsequently reinvested into other DeFi protocols on Avalanche to generate passive income, obscuring the trail of illicit gains.

A futuristic, silver and black hardware device is presented at an angle, featuring a prominent transparent blue section that reveals complex internal components. A central black button and a delicate, ruby-jeweled mechanism, akin to a balance wheel, are clearly visible within this transparent casing

Parameters

  • Protocol Targeted ∞ DeltaPrime
  • Attack Vector ∞ Improper Input Validation
  • Financial Impact ∞ $4.85 Million
  • Blockchains AffectedAvalanche, Arbitrum
  • Vulnerable Functions ∞ swapDebtParaSwap , claimReward
  • Date of Exploit ∞ November 11, 2024

A modern, transparent device with a silver metallic chassis is presented, revealing complex internal components. A circular cutout on its surface highlights an intricate mechanical movement, featuring visible gears and jewels

Outlook

Immediate mitigation for similar protocols necessitates rigorous input validation across all critical functions, especially those handling asset transfers or reward distributions. This incident underscores the importance of comprehensive security audits and the implementation of robust testing frameworks to identify and neutralize unchecked inputs. The broader contagion risk extends to any lending protocol that relies on external parameters without sufficient internal validation, potentially prompting a re-evaluation of smart contract design patterns and a push for more stringent pre-deployment security checks.

A detailed close-up reveals intricate metallic and translucent blue components, forming a complex, interconnected system. Smooth silver structures interlock with vibrant blue conduits, suggesting pathways for flow within a sophisticated mechanism

Verdict

The DeltaPrime exploit serves as a stark reminder that even seemingly minor oversights in smart contract input validation can lead to significant financial compromise and erode trust in decentralized financial systems.

Signal Acquired from ∞ threesigma.xyz

Glossary

lending protocol

Definition ∞ A lending protocol is a decentralized application that facilitates the borrowing and lending of digital assets without intermediaries.

smart contracts

Regulated entities must prepare for a unified federal approach to digital asset derivatives and new innovation pathways as U.

input validation

Definition ∞ Input validation is a critical security process that ensures data entered into a system is accurate, correctly formatted, and meets predefined criteria.

protocol

Definition ∞ A protocol is a set of rules governing data exchange or communication between systems.

attack vector

Attackers deployed a deceptive Etherscan-verified contract, leveraging the Safe Multi Send mechanism to bypass user scrutiny and drain over $3 million.

financial

Definition ∞ Financial refers to matters concerning money, banking, investments, and credit.

avalanche

Definition ∞ Avalanche is a high-performance blockchain platform designed for decentralized applications and custom blockchain deployments.

exploit

Definition ∞ An exploit refers to the malicious utilization of a security flaw or vulnerability within a protocol, smart contract, or application to gain unauthorized access, steal assets, or disrupt operations.

smart contract

Definition ∞ A Smart Contract is a self-executing contract with the terms of the agreement directly written into code.

contract

Definition ∞ A 'Contract' is a set of rules and code that automatically executes when predefined conditions are met.