Skip to main content

Briefing

A sophisticated phishing attack compromised an unidentified crypto investor’s 2-of-4 Safe multi-signature wallet, resulting in the theft of $3.047 million in USDC. The attacker leveraged a meticulously crafted fake Etherscan-verified contract to impersonate a legitimate recipient, disguising a malicious approval within what appeared to be a routine transaction. This incident underscores the escalating complexity of social engineering attacks targeting robust security architectures. The stolen funds were promptly converted to Ethereum and routed through Tornado Cash, obscuring their trail.

The image displays a detailed, close-up view of a complex, segmented structure made of metallic silver and bright blue components. These intricate parts are interconnected, forming a dense, technological assembly against a blurred light background

Context

Prior to this incident, the digital asset landscape faced persistent threats from various phishing methodologies, including direct wallet drainers and front-end compromises. The prevailing attack surface often includes user interaction points where transaction details can be obfuscated or mimicked. This exploit capitalized on the nuanced trust mechanisms associated with Etherscan verification and multi-send functionalities, exploiting a previously known class of vulnerability related to deceptive contract interactions rather than a direct smart contract flaw.

A metallic, silver-toned electronic component, featuring intricate details and connection points, is partially enveloped by a translucent, vibrant blue, fluid-like substance. The substance forms a protective, organic-looking casing around the component, with light reflecting off its glossy surfaces, highlighting its depth and smooth contours against a soft grey background

Analysis

The incident’s technical mechanics involved the attacker deploying a fake Etherscan-verified contract nearly two weeks in advance, programmed with legitimate-looking “batch payment” functions. The compromised system was the user’s perception and scrutiny of transaction details within the Request Finance app interface, coupled with the inherent trust in seemingly verified contracts. The attacker initiated two consecutive transactions where the victim approved transfers to an address that visually mimicked the intended recipient, exploiting the Safe Multi Send mechanism to embed the abnormal approval. This chain of cause and effect demonstrates a sophisticated blend of social engineering and on-chain contract impersonation, enabling the attacker to bypass standard security checks by making the malicious approval appear routine and difficult to detect.

A close-up perspective reveals an intricate metallic lattice framework, partially submerged in a vibrant, translucent blue fluid. A polished silver rod, adorned with black rings, extends horizontally through the center of this dynamic, flowing substance

Parameters

  • Protocol/Wallet Targeted ∞ Unidentified 2-of-4 Safe multi-signature wallet
  • Attack VectorSophisticated Phishing via Contract Impersonation and Disguised Approval
  • Financial Impact ∞ $3.047 Million USDC
  • Blockchain Affected ∞ Ethereum
  • Date of Exploit ∞ September 11, 2025
  • Forensic Details ∞ Funds swapped to ETH, sent to Tornado Cash; attacker used fake Etherscan-verified contract; leveraged Safe Multi Send mechanism; executed via Request Finance app interface

The image displays a series of white, geometrically designed blocks connected in a linear chain, featuring intricate transparent blue components glowing from within. Each block interlocks with the next via a central luminous blue conduit, suggesting active data transmission

Outlook

Immediate mitigation for users involves heightened vigilance when approving transactions, scrutinizing contract addresses beyond superficial resemblance, and verifying all details through independent channels. This incident will likely establish new security best practices emphasizing enhanced transaction simulation tools and user education on the subtle indicators of contract impersonation. It highlights a contagion risk for other protocols and users relying on similar multi-send or batch approval mechanisms without robust internal validation processes, necessitating a re-evaluation of UI/UX design to prevent such deceptive interactions.

A central white sphere is meticulously held by a complex, metallic framework. This entire assembly is embedded within a textured, blue, ice-like matrix

Verdict

This incident decisively confirms the evolving sophistication of social engineering attacks, demonstrating that even multi-signature protections can be circumvented through meticulously crafted contract impersonation and disguised transaction approvals.

Signal Acquired from ∞ cryptoslate.com

Glossary

social engineering attacks

A sophisticated social engineering campaign led to the compromise of a prominent individual's private key, resulting in a seven-figure asset drain.

vulnerability

Definition ∞ A vulnerability refers to a flaw or weakness in a system, protocol, or smart contract that could be exploited by malicious actors to compromise its integrity, security, or functionality.

contract impersonation

Definition ∞ Contract Impersonation refers to a malicious act where an unauthorized party mimics the identity or functionality of a legitimate smart contract.

multi-signature wallet

Advanced phishing leveraging the Safe Multi Send mechanism bypassed multi-sig security, exposing user assets to illicit transfer.

sophisticated phishing

Attackers deployed a deceptive Etherscan-verified contract, leveraging the Safe Multi Send mechanism to bypass user scrutiny and drain over $3 million.

3.047 million

An exploited third-party API allowed attackers to manipulate staking requests, resulting in a significant capital drain from the SOL Earn program.

blockchain

Definition ∞ A blockchain is a distributed, immutable ledger that records transactions across numerous interconnected computers.

exploit

Definition ∞ An exploit refers to the malicious utilization of a security flaw or vulnerability within a protocol, smart contract, or application to gain unauthorized access, steal assets, or disrupt operations.

request finance

Attackers leveraged fake Etherscan-verified contracts and Safe Multi Send to obscure malicious approvals, directly compromising user assets.

security

Definition ∞ Security refers to the measures and protocols designed to protect assets, networks, and data from unauthorized access, theft, or damage.

engineering attacks

A sophisticated social engineering campaign led to the compromise of a prominent individual's private key, resulting in a seven-figure asset drain.