Skip to main content

Briefing

A sophisticated phishing campaign successfully compromised a 2-of-4 Safe multi-signature wallet, leading to the unauthorized transfer of $3.047 million in USDC. The attacker leveraged a meticulously crafted, fake Etherscan-verified contract to obscure malicious approval requests within seemingly legitimate Safe Multi Send transactions. This incident underscores a critical evolution in social engineering tactics, targeting the inherent trust in verified contract interfaces and multi-signature operational flows. The immediate consequence involved the swift exfiltration of funds, which were subsequently converted to Ethereum and routed through a privacy protocol, complicating recovery efforts.

A prominent clear spherical object with an internal white circular panel featuring four distinct circular indentations dominates the center, set against a blurred backdrop of numerous irregularly shaped, faceted blue and dark grey translucent cubes. The central sphere, a visual metaphor for a core protocol or secure enclave, embodies a sophisticated governance mechanism, possibly representing a decentralized autonomous organization DAO or a multi-signature wallet's operational interface

Context

Prior to this incident, the digital asset landscape observed a persistent threat from phishing, often targeting individual users through direct wallet connection requests or malicious links. This attack represents an escalation, moving beyond basic impersonation to exploit the perceived legitimacy of Etherscan verification and the complexity of multi-signature transaction bundling. The prevailing attack surface included user vigilance against transaction details and the implicit trust placed in established on-chain verification mechanisms.

The image displays a close-up of a sleek, transparent electronic device, revealing its intricate internal components. A prominent brushed metallic chip, likely a secure element, is visible through the blue-tinted translucent casing, alongside a circular button and glowing blue circuitry

Analysis

The attack vector involved a multi-stage social engineering exploit targeting the victim’s multi-signature wallet and interaction with the Request Finance app. The attacker deployed a counterfeit, Etherscan-verified contract nearly two weeks in advance, pre-programming it with multiple “batch payment” functions to appear legitimate. On the day of the exploit, a malicious approval was executed through the Request Finance app interface.

This approval was artfully disguised within the Safe Multi Send mechanism, allowing the attacker to bypass standard scrutiny by mimicking the first and last characters of a legitimate recipient address. This chain of events enabled the attacker to gain unauthorized access to and drain the victim’s USDC holdings.

The image showcases a high-precision hardware component, featuring a prominent brushed metal cylinder partially enveloped by a translucent blue casing. Below this, a dark, wavy-edged interface is meticulously framed by polished metallic accents, set against a muted grey background

Parameters

  • Targeted Protocol/Wallet ∞ 2-of-4 Safe multi-signature wallet
  • Vulnerability Type ∞ Sophisticated phishing via fake Etherscan-verified contract and Safe Multi Send exploit
  • Financial Impact ∞ $3.047 Million USDC
  • Blockchain(s) AffectedEthereum
  • Attack Date ∞ September 11, 2025
  • Funds Destination ∞ Ethereum, then Tornado Cash
  • Leveraged Interface ∞ Request Finance app

A blue spherical object, partially covered in white textured snow or ice, is centrally positioned. It is surrounded by several translucent, metallic rings and wisps of white smoke or vapor

Outlook

Immediate mitigation for users involves heightened scrutiny of all transaction approval requests, particularly those involving batch operations or interactions with third-party interfaces. Protocols must enhance their front-end security to detect and flag interactions with known malicious or mimicked contract addresses. This incident will likely establish new best practices for contract verification processes and necessitate more robust client-side transaction simulation tools to expose hidden malicious payloads. The contagion risk extends to any protocol or user relying on similar multi-send mechanisms without rigorous transaction content validation.

A polished metallic cylindrical object, characterized by its ribbed design and dark recessed sections, is partially covered by a vibrant blue, bubbly substance. The precise engineering of the component suggests a core blockchain mechanism undergoing a thorough verification process

Verdict

This incident serves as a critical warning, emphasizing the escalating sophistication of social engineering attacks that exploit trust in verified on-chain identities and complex transaction structures.

Signal Acquired from ∞ cryptoslate.com

Micro Crypto News Feeds

multi-signature wallet

Definition ∞ A multi-signature wallet is a type of digital wallet that requires multiple private keys to authorize a transaction.

multi-signature

Definition ∞ Multi-signature, often abbreviated as multisig, is a type of digital signature that requires more than one cryptographic key to authorize a transaction.

social engineering

Definition ∞ Social engineering is a non-technical method of influencing people to give up confidential information or perform actions that benefit the attacker.

usdc

Definition ∞ USDC is a prominent stablecoin designed to maintain a fixed value relative to the US dollar.

protocol

Definition ∞ A protocol is a set of rules governing data exchange or communication between systems.

vulnerability

Definition ∞ A vulnerability refers to a flaw or weakness in a system, protocol, or smart contract that could be exploited by malicious actors to compromise its integrity, security, or functionality.

ethereum

Definition ∞ Ethereum is a decentralized, open-source blockchain system that facilitates the creation and execution of smart contracts and decentralized applications (dApps).

funds

Definition ∞ Funds, in the context of digital assets, refer to pools of capital pooled together for investment in cryptocurrencies, tokens, or other digital ventures.

transaction approval

Definition ∞ Transaction approval signifies the explicit consent given by a user or authorized party to proceed with a proposed transaction, particularly in digital asset contexts.

transaction

Definition ∞ A transaction is a record of the movement of digital assets or the execution of a smart contract on a blockchain.