Multi-Signature Wallet Drained by Sophisticated Phishing Attack Leveraging Disguised Approval ∞ Security

The image displays a detailed close-up of a complex mechanical assembly, featuring a prominent blue, radially-finned component encased within a translucent, multi-faceted structure. Adjacent to it, a smaller silver gear-like element is visible, all set against a blurred background of similar blue and silver machinery

A textured, white sphere is centrally positioned, encased by a protective structure of translucent blue and metallic silver bars. The intricate framework surrounds the sphere, highlighting its secure containment within a sophisticated digital environment

Briefing

A sophisticated phishing operation successfully compromised a 2-of-4 Safe multi-signature wallet, resulting in the unauthorized transfer of over $3 million in USDC. The primary consequence involves a direct financial loss for the victim and underscores the escalating threat of targeted social engineering against high-value digital asset custodians. This incident quantifies the evolving risk landscape, with $3.047 million in stablecoins siphoned and subsequently routed through privacy protocols.

A highly detailed, three-dimensional object shaped like an 'X' or plus sign, constructed from an array of reflective blue and dark metallic rectangular segments, floats against a soft, light grey background. White, textured snow or frost partially covers the object's surfaces, creating a striking contrast with its intricate, crystalline structure

Context

Before this incident, multi-signature wallets were considered a robust security primitive, offering enhanced control over asset movements. The prevailing attack surface includes sophisticated social engineering tactics and vulnerabilities within external application interfaces. This exploit leveraged a previously recognized class of vulnerability involving disguised transaction approvals, highlighting the persistent challenge of verifying complex on-chain interactions.

The image displays a sophisticated, angular device featuring a metallic silver frame and translucent, flowing blue internal components. A distinct white "1" is visible on one of the blue elements

Analysis

The incident’s technical mechanics involved an attacker deploying a fake, Etherscan-verified contract weeks in advance, meticulously mimicking legitimate batch payment functions. The attacker then initiated a phishing campaign, tricking the victim into approving a malicious transaction through the Request Finance app interface. This approval, disguised by the Safe Multi Send mechanism and near-identical contract addresses, granted the attacker control over the victim’s USDC, enabling the unauthorized transfer. The success of this operation stemmed from the attacker’s ability to weaponize user trust and leverage the complexity of multi-transaction approvals, effectively bypassing standard scrutiny.

A close-up view reveals a polished, metallic object, possibly a hardware wallet, partially encased within a vibrant blue, translucent framework. The entire structure is visibly covered in a layer of white frost, creating a striking contrast and suggesting extreme cold

Parameters

Protocol Targeted ∞ Safe multi-signature wallet, Request Finance app interface
Attack Vector ∞ Sophisticated phishing, disguised transaction approval, contract impersonation
Financial Impact ∞ $3.047 Million USDC
Blockchain(s) Affected ∞ Ethereum
Exploit Mechanism ∞ Fake Etherscan-verified contract, Safe Multi Send abuse
Funds Obfuscation ∞ Tornado Cash

A striking blue crystalline structure, interspersed with clear, rectangular elements, emerges from a wavy, dark blue body of water under a light blue sky. White, foamy masses cling to the base and upper parts of the formation, suggesting dynamic interaction with the water

Outlook

Immediate mitigation for users requires extreme vigilance when reviewing transaction details, particularly for multi-signature approvals, and validating contract addresses beyond superficial checks. This incident will likely establish new security best practices emphasizing enhanced client-side transaction simulation and independent verification of all contract interactions, especially those involving batch operations. The contagion risk extends to other protocols relying on similar multi-send mechanisms or those susceptible to sophisticated contract impersonation within their operational interfaces.

A high-tech, dark blue device showcases a prominent central brushed metal button and a smaller button on its left. A glowing blue circuit board pattern is visible beneath a transparent layer, with a translucent, wavy data stream flowing over the central button

Verdict

This sophisticated phishing attack represents a critical evolution in social engineering, demonstrating attackers’ advanced capabilities to subvert trusted mechanisms and necessitate a systemic re-evaluation of user interaction security within DeFi.

Signal Acquired from ∞ cryptoslate.com