Skip to main content

Briefing

An unidentified crypto investor’s 2-of-4 Safe multi-signature wallet was compromised in a sophisticated phishing attack, resulting in the loss of $3.047 million in USDC. The attacker exploited the Safe Multi Send mechanism, disguising malicious approval requests within seemingly routine transactions. This incident highlights a critical vulnerability in user interaction with decentralized applications, where trust in contract verification can be weaponized.

A close-up view reveals a polished, metallic object, possibly a hardware wallet, partially encased within a vibrant blue, translucent framework. The entire structure is visibly covered in a layer of white frost, creating a striking contrast and suggesting extreme cold

Context

The prevailing attack surface involves user interaction with decentralized applications, where visual verification of transaction details remains a primary defense. This exploit leveraged the persistent threat of social engineering, combined with the increasing sophistication of malicious contract deployments. Prior to this incident, the ecosystem grappled with similar classes of vulnerabilities where attackers mimic legitimate entities to induce user approvals.

The image displays a close-up of a high-tech device, featuring a prominent brushed metallic cylinder, dark matte components, and translucent blue elements that suggest internal workings and connectivity. A circular button is visible on one of the dark sections, indicating an interactive or control point within the intricate assembly

Analysis

The incident’s technical mechanics involved compromising user trust through a meticulously crafted phishing scheme. The attacker deployed a fake, Etherscan-verified contract designed to mimic a legitimate one, ensuring its first and last characters matched the intended recipient’s address. The victim unknowingly authorized transfers through two consecutive transactions via the Request Finance app interface.

This deceptive approval, leveraging the Safe Multi Send mechanism, granted the attacker access to the victim’s funds. Subsequently, $3.047 million in USDC was drained, swiftly swapped for Ethereum, and routed to Tornado Cash for transaction obfuscation.

A sophisticated, transparent blue and metallic device features a central white, textured spherical component precisely engaged by a fine transparent tube. Visible through the clear casing are intricate internal mechanisms, highlighting advanced engineering

Parameters

  • Protocol/Wallet Targeted ∞ Unidentified Crypto Investor’s 2-of-4 Safe Multi-signature Wallet
  • Vulnerability TypeSophisticated Phishing (Malicious Approval Disguise)
  • Financial Impact ∞ $3.047 Million USDC
  • Blockchain Affected ∞ Ethereum
  • Attack Vector ∞ Fake Etherscan-verified contract, Safe Multi Send exploitation
  • Key Security Researchers ∞ ZachXBT, SlowMist (Yu Xian), Scam Sniffer
  • Obfuscation Method ∞ Tornado Cash
  • Exploit Date ∞ September 11, 2025 (flagged by ZachXBT)

A close-up reveals a sophisticated, metallic device featuring a translucent blue screen displaying intricate digital patterns and alphanumeric characters. A prominent silver frame with a central button accents the front, suggesting an interactive interface for user input and transaction confirmation

Outlook

Immediate mitigation demands extreme vigilance from users when approving transactions, extending beyond superficial address checks. This event will likely prompt increased scrutiny on decentralized application interfaces and multi-signature wallet approval mechanisms, potentially leading to enhanced visual cues for detecting malicious approvals. Protocols may implement more robust pre-transaction verification layers and comprehensive user education on advanced phishing tactics to counter these evolving threats.

A close-up view reveals a high-tech device featuring a silver-grey metallic casing with prominent dark blue internal components and accents. A central, faceted blue translucent element glows brightly, suggesting active processing or energy flow within the intricate machinery

Verdict

This incident unequivocally demonstrates the escalating sophistication of social engineering in Web3, demanding a paradigm shift towards enhanced user education and integrated protocol-level verification to fortify digital asset security.

Signal Acquired from ∞ CryptoSlate.com

Glossary

decentralized applications

**: Single sentence, maximum 130 characters, core research breakthrough.

social engineering

Definition ∞ Social engineering is a non-technical method of influencing people to give up confidential information or perform actions that benefit the attacker.

phishing

Definition ∞ Phishing, in the digital asset space, involves deceptive practices aimed at tricking individuals into divulging sensitive information, such as private keys or login credentials, typically through fraudulent communications.

3.047 million

An exploited third-party API allowed attackers to manipulate staking requests, resulting in a significant capital drain from the SOL Earn program.

multi-signature wallet

Advanced phishing leveraging the Safe Multi Send mechanism bypassed multi-sig security, exposing user assets to illicit transfer.

sophisticated phishing

Attackers deployed a deceptive Etherscan-verified contract, leveraging the Safe Multi Send mechanism to bypass user scrutiny and drain over $3 million.

security

Definition ∞ Security refers to the measures and protocols designed to protect assets, networks, and data from unauthorized access, theft, or damage.

exploit

Definition ∞ An exploit refers to the malicious utilization of a security flaw or vulnerability within a protocol, smart contract, or application to gain unauthorized access, steal assets, or disrupt operations.

verification

Definition ∞ Verification is the process of confirming the truth, accuracy, or validity of information or claims.

digital asset

Definition ∞ A digital asset is a digital representation of value that can be owned, transferred, and traded.