Skip to main content

Briefing

An advanced phishing campaign successfully targeted a 2-of-4 Safe multi-signature wallet, orchestrating the unauthorized transfer of digital assets. The attacker exploited the Safe Multi Send mechanism, employing a meticulously crafted, fake Etherscan-verified contract to obscure a malicious approval within a seemingly routine transaction. This intricate social engineering attack resulted in the exfiltration of $3.047 million in USDC, which the perpetrator subsequently routed through Tornado Cash to obfuscate the funds’ origin.

A metallic, silver-toned electronic component, featuring intricate details and connection points, is partially enveloped by a translucent, vibrant blue, fluid-like substance. The substance forms a protective, organic-looking casing around the component, with light reflecting off its glossy surfaces, highlighting its depth and smooth contours against a soft grey background

Context

Prior to this incident, the prevailing threat landscape included increasing sophistication in phishing attacks, often targeting user approvals and leveraging trust in verified on-chain entities. The inherent complexity of multi-signature wallet interactions and the reliance on visual inspection for contract addresses created a fertile attack surface. Attackers frequently exploited the difficulty users face in discerning legitimate contract interactions from malicious ones, particularly when complex transaction bundles are involved.

A futuristic, modular white satellite-like structure with solar panels propels a vigorous stream of frothy blue water into a cloudy, watery expanse. This central aperture serves as a symbolic protocol gateway, channeling immense data availability or liquidity flow

Analysis

The incident’s technical mechanics involved the attacker deploying a counterfeit contract weeks in advance, programmed with legitimate-looking batch payment functions and achieving Etherscan verification. The core system compromised was the user’s trust and the Safe Multi Send mechanism’s ability to bundle transactions, which the attacker leveraged to disguise a critical malicious approval. The attacker initiated two consecutive transactions where the victim approved transfers to an address designed to mimic a legitimate recipient, mirroring its first and last characters. This deceptive contract, combined with the Request Finance app interface for execution, allowed the malicious approval to execute under the guise of a standard operation, thereby circumventing the victim’s scrutiny and enabling the asset drain.

A translucent, undulating blue and white shell encases a complex, multi-component mechanical assembly. Visible within are stacked silver plates, intricate blue and silver cylindrical parts, and black structural supports, all illuminated by internal blue light

Parameters

  • Exploited Protocol/Wallet ∞ 2-of-4 Safe Multi-signature Wallet
  • Attack VectorSophisticated Phishing via Malicious Contract Mimicry and Safe Multi Send
  • Financial Impact ∞ $3.047 Million USDC
  • Blockchain AffectedEthereum
  • Key Forensic Detail ∞ Funds bridged to Ethereum, then laundered via Tornado Cash
  • Initial Detection ∞ ZachXBT on September 11, 2025
  • Exploit Mechanism ∞ Fake Etherscan-verified contract with mirrored address characters

A sculptural object, rendered in deep blue translucent material and intricate white textured layers, is precisely split down its vertical axis. This division reveals the complex, organic internal stratification of the piece, resembling geological formations or fluid dynamics

Outlook

Immediate mitigation steps for users include rigorous verification of all transaction details, even within seemingly legitimate interfaces, and a heightened awareness of contract address spoofing. This incident underscores the urgent need for enhanced wallet security features that provide clearer, human-readable breakdowns of complex transaction approvals. The broader ecosystem faces a contagion risk if similar sophisticated phishing techniques are not robustly countered, potentially leading to new security best practices centered on advanced transaction simulation and pre-signing analysis tools to detect hidden malicious approvals.

The image displays a sophisticated, multi-faceted device with a central transparent dome revealing glowing blue circuitry. Surrounding this core is a polished silver casing, suggesting advanced technological design

Verdict

This incident decisively confirms the escalating threat of highly sophisticated social engineering tactics targeting the weakest link in digital asset security ∞ human vigilance.

Signal Acquired from ∞ cryptoslate.com

Glossary

multi-signature wallet

Attackers leveraged fake contracts and disguised approvals to compromise a multi-signature wallet, resulting in significant asset loss.

on-chain

Definition ∞ On-chain refers to any transaction or data that is recorded and validated directly on a blockchain ledger, making it publicly verifiable and immutable.

malicious approval

Attackers deployed a verified contract to disguise fraudulent approvals, draining funds from a multi-signature wallet.

protocol

Definition ∞ A protocol is a set of rules governing data exchange or communication between systems.

sophisticated phishing

Attackers leveraged fake contracts and disguised approvals to compromise a multi-signature wallet, resulting in significant asset loss.

3.047 million

An exploited third-party API allowed attackers to manipulate staking requests, resulting in a significant capital drain from the SOL Earn program.

ethereum

Definition ∞ Ethereum is a decentralized, open-source blockchain system that facilitates the creation and execution of smart contracts and decentralized applications (dApps).

phishing

Definition ∞ Phishing, in the digital asset space, involves deceptive practices aimed at tricking individuals into divulging sensitive information, such as private keys or login credentials, typically through fraudulent communications.

social engineering

Definition ∞ Social engineering is a non-technical method of influencing people to give up confidential information or perform actions that benefit the attacker.