Briefing

Nemo Protocol, a yield-trading platform on the Sui blockchain, suffered a significant exploit on September 7, 2025. This incident resulted in the loss of $2.6 million in digital assets from its SY/PT liquidity pool. The attack vector involved two critical vulnerabilities → a publicly exposed flash loan function and a query function capable of unauthorized state changes. This event underscores the paramount importance of rigorous code auditing and robust governance mechanisms in safeguarding decentralized finance protocols.

A polished metallic cylinder, resembling a digital asset, is partially immersed in a vibrant blue and white frothy substance, set against a blurred background of intricate machinery. The effervescent material signifies the intense computational activity and data flow inherent in a robust blockchain ecosystem

Context

The prevailing attack surface for DeFi protocols frequently involves vulnerabilities introduced through unaudited code deployments. Nemo Protocol’s reliance on a single-signature address for contract upgrades presented a significant pre-existing risk. This centralized control allowed a developer to introduce new, unaudited features into the codebase, bypassing essential scrutiny.

A futuristic mechanical assembly, predominantly white and metallic grey with vibrant blue translucent accents, is shown in a state of partial disassembly against a dark grey background. Various cylindrical modules are separated, revealing internal components and a central spherical lens-like element

Analysis

The incident leveraged two specific system compromises within Nemo Protocol’s smart contracts. An internal flash loan function was mistakenly exposed to the public, allowing uncollateralized borrowing. Concurrently, a flaw in the “get_sy_amount_in_for_exact_py_out” query function permitted unauthorized modifications to the contract’s internal state. The attacker executed a multi-step operation, combining the flash loan capability with the state-modifying query function to manipulate the SY/PT liquidity pool.

This chain of cause and effect enabled the attacker to drain substantial assets. The stolen funds were subsequently moved from the Sui network to Ethereum via the Wormhole CCTP bridge, with the majority residing in a single address.

A high-tech, white modular apparatus is depicted in a state of connection, with two primary sections slightly apart, showcasing complex internal mechanisms illuminated by intense blue light. A brilliant, pulsating blue energy stream, representing a secure data channel, actively links the two modules

Parameters

  • Protocol Targeted → Nemo Protocol
  • Attack VectorUnaudited Code Deployment, Flash Loan Exploitation, State Manipulation
  • Financial Impact → $2.6 Million
  • Blockchain(s) Affected → Sui, Ethereum (via Wormhole CCTP)
  • Vulnerability Identified → Public Flash Loan Function, State-Modifying Query Function (“get_sy_amount_in_for_exact_py_out”)
  • Date of Exploit → September 7, 2025
  • Governance Weakness → Single-Signature Upgrade Address

A striking visual depicts a luminous blue, bubbly liquid moving along a dark metallic channel, creating a sense of dynamic flow and intricate processing. The liquid's surface is covered in countless small, spherical bubbles, indicating effervescence or aeration within the transparent medium

Outlook

Immediate mitigation steps for users involve exercising extreme caution with DeFi protocols exhibiting centralized upgrade mechanisms. The incident highlights the critical need for multi-signature governance and continuous, independent smart contract audits. This exploit will likely establish new security best practices emphasizing immutable code deployment processes and enhanced pre-deployment vulnerability assessments. Similar protocols must re-evaluate their internal controls and audit pipelines to prevent contagion risk from comparable architectural flaws.

The image features a sophisticated mechanical assembly composed of blue and silver gears, shafts, and rings, intricately intertwined. White granular particles are scattered around and within these components, while a transparent, syringe-like element extends from the left

Verdict

This incident serves as a definitive case study on the catastrophic financial and reputational consequences stemming from a lapse in fundamental smart contract security practices and governance oversight.

Signal Acquired from → The Block

Micro Crypto News Feeds

decentralized finance

Definition ∞ Decentralized finance, often abbreviated as DeFi, is a system of financial services built on blockchain technology that operates without central intermediaries.

defi protocols

Definition ∞ DeFi protocols are decentralized applications that provide financial services without traditional intermediaries.

liquidity pool

Liquidity Pool ∞ is a collection of cryptocurrency tokens locked in a smart contract, typically used to facilitate decentralized trading.

protocol

Definition ∞ A protocol is a set of rules governing data exchange or communication between systems.

unaudited code

Definition ∞ Unaudited code refers to software source code that has not undergone a formal security or functional review by independent experts.

flash loan

Definition ∞ A flash loan is a type of uncollateralized loan that must be borrowed and repaid within a single transaction block on a blockchain.

exploit

Definition ∞ An exploit refers to the malicious utilization of a security flaw or vulnerability within a protocol, smart contract, or application to gain unauthorized access, steal assets, or disrupt operations.

governance

Definition ∞ Governance refers to the systems, processes, and rules by which an entity or system is directed and controlled.

smart contract

Definition ∞ A Smart Contract is a self-executing contract with the terms of the agreement directly written into code.

contract

Definition ∞ A 'Contract' is a set of rules and code that automatically executes when predefined conditions are met.