Briefing

The official website for the PEPE memecoin was compromised, resulting in a malicious front-end injection that redirected visitors to a fraudulent interface. This attack bypassed user trust in the official domain to lure them into approving a malicious transaction that enabled asset theft. The exploit leveraged the sophisticated “Inferno Drainer” malware, a service that has demonstrated a high operational tempo by infecting an estimated 2,400 decentralized applications per week across the ecosystem. This incident is a clear demonstration that Web2-style operational security failures are a persistent and high-volume threat vector for Web3 asset holders.

A modern, rectangular device with a silver metallic chassis and a clear, blue-tinted top cover is presented against a plain white background. Visible through the transparent top, a complex internal mechanism featuring a polished circular platter, gears, and an articulating arm suggests a precision data processing or storage unit

Context

Before this incident, the prevailing threat landscape already classified front-end and DNS hijacking as a critical, non-smart contract vulnerability class. This vector exploits the centralized Web2 infrastructure → specifically the domain host or third-party dependencies → that many decentralized applications rely on for their user interface. The attacker did not exploit the underlying smart contract logic but rather the user’s implicit trust in the official domain, which is a known and difficult-to-mitigate human-factor risk.

A detailed view captures a gleaming, multi-layered metallic framework housing embedded radiant blue square panels and numerous scattered blue gems. Fine white bubbles intricately cover parts of the structure, creating a dynamic texture against the sharp, reflective surfaces

Analysis

The attack vector was a malicious script injection into the official website’s front-end, likely via a compromise of the site’s host or a third-party component. This script either redirected the user to a phishing site or overlaid the legitimate interface with a fraudulent transaction request. The core mechanic relied on tricking the user into signing a seemingly innocuous transaction, which was, in reality, a malicious setApprovalForAll call. By granting the attacker’s address unlimited spending authority over a user’s tokens, the associated wallet drainer malware was then able to systematically sweep all approved assets from the connected wallet.

A complex mechanical device features polished silver components, dark black tubing, and bright electric blue glowing elements, set against a muted grey background. The intricate machinery is densely packed, with various conduits and structural elements converging around the central glowing core, suggesting an advanced technological engine

Parameters

  • Vector → Front-End Compromise / Malicious Redirect
  • Exploit ToolInferno Drainer Malware
  • Vulnerability TypeMalicious Script Injection & Trust Exploitation
  • Observed Scale → 2,400 DApps Infected Weekly (Inferno Drainer’s scale)

A close-up view reveals intricate blue and black electronic components, circuit boards, and connecting wires forming a complex, abstract digital structure. These elements are sharply focused in the foreground, showcasing detailed textures and interconnections, while the background remains blurred with diffuse blue light

Outlook

Users must immediately revoke all token approvals for the affected protocol and adopt a “least privilege” security posture by only approving tokens as needed. For all protocols, this incident necessitates the immediate implementation of robust Content Security Policies (CSP) to restrict unauthorized script execution and a multi-layer security audit of all third-party front-end dependencies. The continued evolution of wallet drainer services like Inferno Drainer underscores that the defense perimeter for Web3 must extend beyond smart contract code to encompass the entire user-facing supply chain.

This high-profile compromise confirms that operational security failures on centralized web infrastructure remain the most significant and scalable threat to individual digital asset holders.

Front end attack, malicious script injection, wallet drainer malware, token approval scam, supply chain risk, web security failure, decentralized finance risk, asset theft, social engineering attack, phishing campaign, browser wallet compromise, dApp interface hack, website redirection, user asset protection, open source risk, digital asset security, operational security failure, third party risk Signal Acquired from → cointribune.com

Micro Crypto News Feeds