Briefing

The latest attack vector targets user operational security (OpSec), compromising over a thousand users via a malicious airdrop claim that drained more than $130,000 in approved assets. The incident centered on the @dexmaxai DMT airdrop, where users were socially engineered to sign a transaction that granted a malicious contract unlimited token approval. This attack bypasses hardware wallet protection by leveraging the user’s own authorized signature, a critical vulnerability in the ERC-20 standard.

A close-up reveals an intricate assembly of silver modular computing units and prominent blue mechanical components, interconnected by various rods and wires. The shallow depth of field highlights the central blue mechanism, emphasizing the precision engineering of this complex system

Context

The prevailing threat landscape is characterized by a shift from complex smart contract exploits to scalable, user-facing social engineering attacks. The fundamental risk factor remains the widespread practice of granting infinite token allowances, which turns a single future contract compromise or a malicious front-end interaction into a catastrophic asset loss event. This attack class exploits the user’s trust and the permissioned nature of the approve() function, even when the core protocol contracts are secure.

A meticulously rendered mechanical component features a central transparent rod extending from a complex assembly of metallic silver and translucent electric blue elements. The primary focus is on a luminous, segmented blue ring and an adjacent silver structure with multiple apertures, suggesting an advanced technological mechanism

Analysis

The attack chain began with a phishing campaign disguised as an airdrop claim for the DMT token. Upon connecting their wallet to the malicious interface, users were prompted to sign an additional, hidden transaction that was not the token claim but an approve() function call, granting the attacker’s contract unlimited spending power over the user’s other tokens. The attacker then executed a transferFrom() call to siphon the approved assets and immediately bridged them to Ethereum for laundering, demonstrating a multi-chain profit extraction strategy. The swift shutdown of the project’s website suggests a planned rug pull utilizing this malicious approval vector.

A close-up view reveals a high-tech device featuring a silver-grey metallic casing with prominent dark blue internal components and accents. A central, faceted blue translucent element glows brightly, suggesting active processing or energy flow within the intricate machinery

Parameters

  • Total Funds Drained → $130,000 USD. A very brief explanation → The minimum reported total value stolen from compromised user wallets.
  • Users Compromised → Over 1,000. A very brief explanation → The number of individual wallets that executed the malicious token approval.
  • Attack Vector Type → Malicious Token Approval. A very brief explanation → Exploited the ERC-20 approve() function via a phishing front-end.

The image displays abstract, layered forms composed of smooth, matte white and vibrant, glowing blue elements. These forms interweave and overlap, creating a sense of depth and dynamic movement, with the blue elements appearing to emanate light from within a central core

Outlook

Immediate mitigation requires all users who interacted with the airdrop to revoke all active token approvals immediately using a dedicated revocation tool. This incident will further establish the need for wallets to implement granular, transaction-simulation security features that clearly display the actual function being called (e.g. approve vs. transfer ) and the unlimited nature of the allowance. Protocols must also move toward time-bound or single-use approvals to minimize user exposure to this persistent class of threat.

The image displays an intricate, ring-shaped arrangement of interconnected digital modules. These white and gray block-like components feature glowing blue sections, suggesting active data transfer within a complex system

Verdict

The weaponization of token approvals via social engineering represents a critical and scalable OpSec failure, shifting the primary attack surface from contract code to the end-user.

token approval exploit, malicious signature, wallet drainer, phishing attack, cross-chain transfer, airdrop scam, smart contract hygiene, asset draining, user operational security, token allowance, ERC-20 approve function, front-end compromise, social engineering, security alert, digital asset theft, on-chain forensics, mempool monitoring, transaction blocking, real-time defense, decentralized exchange, liquidity pool, asset protection, risk mitigation, chain analysis, web3 security Signal Acquired from → slowmist.io

Micro Crypto News Feeds