PulseChain Lending Protocol BetterBank Drained by Reward Manipulation → Security

A white and grey cylindrical device, resembling a data processing unit, is seen spilling a mixture of blue granular particles and white frothy liquid onto a dark circuit board. The circuit board features white lines depicting intricate pathways and visible binary code

A series of interlinked white hexagonal modules form a structured system, with a central component emitting a powerful blue light and numerous discrete particles. The bright luminescence and ejected elements create a dynamic visual against a dark background

Briefing

The PulseChain-based decentralized lending protocol, BetterBank, suffered a significant exploit resulting in approximately $5 million in stolen assets. Attackers leveraged a complex reward minting and liquidity manipulation scheme, exploiting the protocol’s ESTEEM reward system. This incident highlights the critical vulnerabilities inherent in incentive mechanisms and liquidity pools within the DeFi ecosystem, leading to substantial financial loss for the protocol and its users.

The intricate design showcases a futuristic device with a central, translucent blue optical component, surrounded by polished metallic surfaces and subtle dark blue accents. A small orange button is visible, hinting at interactive functionality within its complex architecture

Context

Prior to this incident, the DeFi landscape has consistently faced sophisticated attacks targeting various vulnerabilities, including those related to reward systems and liquidity provision. The open-source nature of many DeFi protocols, combined with the rapid deployment of unaudited or insufficiently vetted smart contracts, creates an expansive attack surface. This environment often allows for the exploitation of intricate logic flaws, especially in systems involving token issuance and dynamic liquidity management.

A striking abstract form, rendered in luminous blue and translucent material, features an outer surface adorned with numerous small, spherical bubbles, set against a soft, gradient background. Its internal structure reveals complex, layered pathways, suggesting intricate design and functional depth within its fluid contours

Analysis

The incident’s technical mechanics involved the manipulation of BetterBank’s ESTEEM reward system, which was designed to issue tokens for liquidity provision to FAVOR. Attackers initiated the exploit by creating a counterfeit ERC20 token, pairing it with PDAIF, and subsequently engaging in wash trading to artificially inflate its value. This strategic inflation of ESTEEM rewards enabled the conversion of the synthetic supply into genuine assets, ultimately destabilizing the underlying liquidity pool and facilitating the illicit withdrawal of funds. The stolen assets were then laundered via PulseChain DEXes, with a portion bridged to Ethereum and obscured using Tornado Cash.

The image displays a close-up of a sleek, translucent blue object with a prominent brushed metallic band. A small, circular, luminous blue button or indicator is embedded in the center of the metallic band

Parameters

Protocol Targeted → BetterBank
Attack Vector → Reward Minting and Liquidity Manipulation
Financial Impact → Approximately $5 Million
Blockchain(s) Affected → PulseChain, Ethereum
Vulnerability Type → Logic Flaw in Reward System
Exploited System → ESTEEM Reward System
Security Firm Analysis → QuillAudits

The image showcases a detailed close-up of a central metallic, circular component with a luminous blue core, partially immersed in a vibrant, effervescent blue material. This mechanism is housed within a robust blue structural framework, highlighting precision engineering and complex internal operations

Outlook

Immediate mitigation for similar protocols necessitates rigorous auditing of reward distribution logic and comprehensive stress testing of liquidity pools against manipulation vectors, including flash loans and wash trading. This exploit will likely prompt an industry-wide re-evaluation of incentive mechanisms and the security implications of token issuance in lending protocols. Enhanced real-time monitoring and a shift towards multi-layered security frameworks that account for both on-chain and off-chain manipulation are crucial to prevent contagion and establish new best practices.

A close-up view reveals a sleek, translucent device featuring a prominent metallic button and a subtle blue internal glow. The material appears to be a frosted polymer, with smooth, ergonomic contours

Verdict

The BetterBank exploit underscores the persistent and evolving threat of economic manipulation within DeFi, demanding a proactive and holistic security posture across all protocol layers.

Signal Acquired from → mitrade.com