Skip to main content

Briefing

A sophisticated phishing campaign successfully compromised an investor’s 2-of-4 Safe multi-signature wallet on September 11, 2025. This attack vector leveraged a fake Etherscan-verified contract and the Safe Multi Send mechanism, tricking the victim into authorizing a malicious transaction. The primary consequence is the direct loss of $3.047 million in USDC, which the attacker swiftly converted to Ethereum and laundered through Tornado Cash. This incident underscores the escalating sophistication of social engineering tactics targeting high-value digital assets.

A futuristic transparent device, resembling an advanced hardware wallet or cryptographic module, displays intricate internal components illuminated with a vibrant blue glow. The top surface features tactile buttons, including one marked with an '8', and a central glowing square, suggesting sophisticated user interaction for secure operations

Context

Prior to this incident, the digital asset landscape faced persistent threats from increasingly sophisticated phishing operations. Attackers routinely leverage social engineering and contract impersonation to bypass user vigilance. The prevailing attack surface includes transaction approval mechanisms, where users inadvertently grant malicious contracts access to their funds. This exploit highlights the critical risk posed by deceptive contract verification and the complexities of multi-send transaction approvals.

A clear, faceted crystalline object is centrally positioned within a broken white ring, superimposed on a detailed, luminous blue circuit board. This imagery evokes the cutting edge of digital security and decentralized systems

Analysis

The attacker executed a multi-stage phishing operation, compromising an investor’s multi-signature wallet. This attack began with the deployment of a fake, yet Etherscan-verified, contract weeks in advance, programmed to mimic legitimate batch payment functions. On the day of the exploit, the victim interacted with the Request Finance app interface, unknowingly approving a malicious transaction disguised within a routine Safe Multi Send operation.

The attacker crafted the fraudulent contract address to closely resemble the legitimate one, deceiving the victim’s scrutiny. This method successfully bypassed standard approval checks, enabling the unauthorized transfer of funds.

A highly detailed render showcases intricate glossy blue and lighter azure bands dynamically interwoven around dark, metallic, rectangular modules. The reflective surfaces and precise engineering convey a sense of advanced technological design and robust construction

Parameters

  • Victim ∞ Unidentified crypto investor’s 2-of-4 Safe multi-signature wallet
  • Vulnerability ∞ Sophisticated phishing via fake Etherscan-verified contract and Safe Multi Send mechanism abuse
  • Funds Lost ∞ $3.047 million in USDC
  • Blockchain AffectedEthereum
  • Attack Date ∞ September 11, 2025
  • Attacker’s Action ∞ Swapped USDC for Ethereum, laundered through Tornado Cash
  • Expert Confirmation ∞ ZachXBT, SlowMist founder Yu Xian, Scam Sniffer
  • Leveraged Interface ∞ Request Finance app

A textured, white sphere is centrally positioned, encased by a protective structure of translucent blue and metallic silver bars. The intricate framework surrounds the sphere, highlighting its secure containment within a sophisticated digital environment

Outlook

This incident mandates a reevaluation of user transaction verification processes and heightened awareness against contract impersonation. Users must exercise extreme caution when approving transactions, particularly those involving multi-send mechanisms or interactions with third-party applications. Protocols and security firms will likely prioritize advanced detection mechanisms for deceptive contract addresses and more robust front-end security to prevent similar social engineering exploits. This event reinforces the need for continuous user education on sophisticated phishing tactics.

A close-up reveals a sophisticated, metallic device featuring a translucent blue screen displaying intricate digital patterns and alphanumeric characters. A prominent silver frame with a central button accents the front, suggesting an interactive interface for user input and transaction confirmation

Verdict

This sophisticated phishing attack on a multi-signature wallet establishes a critical precedent for refined social engineering tactics, demanding immediate, comprehensive advancements in user education and transaction verification protocols across the digital asset ecosystem.

Signal Acquired from ∞ cryptoslate.com

Micro Crypto News Feeds

multi-signature wallet

Definition ∞ A multi-signature wallet is a type of digital wallet that requires multiple private keys to authorize a transaction.

contract impersonation

Definition ∞ Contract Impersonation refers to a malicious act where an unauthorized party mimics the identity or functionality of a legitimate smart contract.

multi-signature

Definition ∞ Multi-signature, often abbreviated as multisig, is a type of digital signature that requires more than one cryptographic key to authorize a transaction.

contract

Definition ∞ A 'Contract' is a set of rules and code that automatically executes when predefined conditions are met.

wallet

Definition ∞ A digital wallet is a software or hardware application that stores public and private keys, enabling users to send, receive, and manage their digital assets on a blockchain.

phishing

Definition ∞ Phishing, in the digital asset space, involves deceptive practices aimed at tricking individuals into divulging sensitive information, such as private keys or login credentials, typically through fraudulent communications.

funds

Definition ∞ Funds, in the context of digital assets, refer to pools of capital pooled together for investment in cryptocurrencies, tokens, or other digital ventures.

ethereum

Definition ∞ Ethereum is a decentralized, open-source blockchain system that facilitates the creation and execution of smart contracts and decentralized applications (dApps).

tornado cash

Definition ∞ Tornado Cash is a decentralized cryptocurrency mixing service designed to enhance user privacy by obscuring the transaction history of digital assets.

transaction verification

Definition ∞ Transaction Verification is the process by which a blockchain network confirms the validity and authenticity of a proposed transaction before it is permanently recorded on the ledger.

social engineering

Definition ∞ Social engineering is a non-technical method of influencing people to give up confidential information or perform actions that benefit the attacker.