Briefing

The USPD stablecoin protocol suffered a $1 million loss following a highly sophisticated “Clandestine Proxy In the Middle of Proxy” (CPIMP) attack. This breach exploited a critical vulnerability in the contract’s deployment phase, where the attacker covertly secured the proxy’s admin rights before the legitimate setup completed. The consequence was a catastrophic loss of trust and liquidity as the attacker, months later, upgraded the contract to a malicious implementation, minting approximately 98 million unauthorized tokens to drain the pool. The quantifiable detail is the $1 million in assets, including stETH, that were successfully siphoned from the protocol.

A series of white, conical interface modules emerge from a light grey, grid-patterned wall, each surrounded by a dense, circular arrangement of dark blue, angular computational blocks. Delicate white wires connect these blue blocks to the central white module and the wall, depicting an intricate technological assembly

Context

The prevailing risk factor in protocols utilizing proxy patterns is the centralization of upgradeability through an administrative key or role. Prior to this event, the security posture of many proxy-based DeFi systems was implicitly reliant on the security of the initial deployment script and the post-deployment control of the admin key. This created an attack surface at the precise moment of contract initialization, a narrow window that is often overlooked in favor of post-deployment audit rigor.

The image displays a complex, highly polished metallic structure, featuring interconnected, twisting dark chrome elements against a soft, blurred deep blue background illuminated by subtle bokeh lights. The intricate design suggests a sophisticated, futuristic framework

Analysis

The attacker’s success stemmed from a race condition or flawed sequence in the protocol’s deployment process. By executing a transaction to seize the proxy’s admin role before the project’s own initialization script could claim it, the attacker planted a malicious “shadow implementation” contract. This stealth contract cleverly proxied calls to the legitimate, audited code to remain undetected by explorers like Etherscan, while secretly retaining the ability to execute a future, malicious upgrade. The final action was the malicious upgrade, which enabled the attacker to mint a massive, unauthorized supply of USPD tokens, effectively diluting the pool and draining the underlying $1 million in liquidity.

The image showcases a detailed close-up of a precision-engineered mechanical component, featuring a central metallic shaft surrounded by multiple concentric rings and blue structural elements. The intricate design highlights advanced manufacturing and material science, with brushed metal textures and dark inner mechanisms

Parameters

  • Total Loss Value → $1,000,000 USD (Approximate value of assets drained from the liquidity pool)
  • Attack Vector TypeClandestine Proxy In the Middle of Proxy (CPIMP) (Exploit of a proxy contract’s deployment and admin initialization)
  • Vulnerability Timeline → September 16 to December 4, 2025 (Attacker gained admin control months before the final asset drain)
  • Stolen Asset Type → stETH, USPD Tokens (Underlying liquidity and newly minted tokens were siphoned)

A detailed close-up showcases a sophisticated assembly of metallic blue and silver mechanical or electronic components, interconnected by numerous blue wires against a blurred blue background. The intricate structure features various bolts, plates, and what appear to be data modules, highlighting precision engineering

Outlook

Immediate mitigation for users is the revocation of all token approvals granted to the affected USPD contract. For developers, this incident mandates a critical review of all proxy contract deployment and initialization sequences, particularly the non-atomic assignment of administrative roles. The CPIMP attack demonstrates a new, stealthy threat model where an exploit can be embedded during deployment and lie dormant for months, increasing the contagion risk for any protocol that uses non-standard or vulnerable proxy initialization logic. New auditing standards must prioritize the entire deployment lifecycle, not just the final contract code.

A translucent, rounded element is prominently featured, resting on a layered base of vibrant blue and polished silver. This composition evokes the tangible interaction points within the digital asset landscape

Verdict

The USPD CPIMP attack confirms that the security perimeter must extend beyond the audited implementation code to encompass the entire, often-neglected, contract deployment and administrative key lifecycle.

proxy contract security, upgradeability logic flaw, initialization function exploit, stale admin key, token minting vulnerability, clandestine proxy attack, deployment phase risk, shadow implementation code, stablecoin peg risk, asset liquidity drain, decentralized finance exploit, on-chain forensic analysis, governance key compromise, smart contract audit failure, wei deposit attack Signal Acquired from → tradingview.com

Micro Crypto News Feeds