
Briefing
A critical security incident impacted the UXLINK protocol, stemming from a delegate call vulnerability within its multi-signature wallet architecture. This exploit granted the attacker administrative privileges, enabling both unauthorized asset transfers and the minting of an astronomical 10 trillion CRUXLINK tokens on the Arbitrum blockchain, leading to a severe market devaluation and liquidity drain. The immediate consequence was a substantial loss of protocol assets, with estimates ranging from at least $11 million to over $30 million in direct funds siphoned. Further complicating the incident, the attacker subsequently lost approximately $43 million of the stolen UXLINK tokens to a separate phishing attack, highlighting the pervasive risks within the digital asset ecosystem.

Context
Prior to this incident, the prevailing attack surface for DeFi protocols often included unaudited contracts or insufficient controls around administrative functions. Multi-signature wallets, while designed to enhance security through requiring multiple approvals, can introduce critical vulnerabilities if their underlying code or integration with external calls is not rigorously secured. The UXLINK exploit leveraged this known class of vulnerability, demonstrating how a seemingly robust security mechanism can be compromised through a specific, technical flaw.

Analysis
The incident’s technical mechanics centered on a delegate call vulnerability embedded within UXLINK’s multi-signature wallet. This flaw allowed the attacker to execute arbitrary code and seize administrative control over the contract. With elevated privileges, the malicious actor initiated unauthorized transfers of existing assets and, more critically, minted an unprecedented 10 trillion CRUXLINK tokens.
These newly minted tokens were then partially liquidated across decentralized exchanges, draining liquidity pools and causing the token’s value to plummet by over 70%. The success of this attack underscores a critical failure in the protocol’s access control and minting mechanisms, which lacked adequate safeguards such as timelocks or hardcoded supply caps.

Parameters
- Protocol Targeted ∞ UXLINK
- Attack Vector ∞ Delegate Call Vulnerability in Multi-Signature Wallet
- Blockchain(s) Affected ∞ Arbitrum
- Initial Financial Impact (Protocol) ∞ Estimated $11M – $30M+
- Unauthorized Token Minted ∞ ~10 Trillion CRUXLINK Tokens
- Attacker’s Subsequent Loss ∞ $43 Million (to phishing)
- Date of Initial Exploit ∞ September 22, 2025

Outlook
In response to the exploit, UXLINK has initiated a token migration to a newly audited smart contract, which includes a capped supply and the removal of the mint-burn function to prevent recurrence. This incident serves as a stark reminder for all protocols utilizing multi-signature wallets to conduct comprehensive, independent audits specifically targeting delegate call interactions and administrative privilege escalation vectors. Immediate mitigation for users involves exercising extreme caution with any UXLINK-related transactions on decentralized exchanges. The broader digital asset security landscape will likely see an increased emphasis on implementing timelocks for sensitive contract actions, renouncing minting privileges post-launch, and hard-coding supply caps directly into smart contracts to prevent similar catastrophic supply inflation.
